Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Implementing Accountable Care Organizations: Lessons From a Qualitative Analysis of Four Private Sector Organizations
Daniel M Walker1, Jennifer L Hefner, Lindsey N Sova
1Daniel M. Walker, PhD, assistant professor, Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Jennifer L. Hefner, PhD, assistant professor, Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University; Lindsey N. Sova, research associate, Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University; Brian Hilligoss, PhD, associate professor, Department of Management and Organizations, Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson; Paula H. Song, PhD, associate professor, Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; and Ann Scheck McAlearney, ScD, professor and vice chair of research, Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, and Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University.
Executive Summary:
Accountable care organizations (ACOs) are emerging across the healthcare marketplace and now include Medicare, Medicaid, and private sector payers covering more than 24 million lives. However, little is known about the process of organizational change required to achieve cost savings and quality improvements from the ACO model. This study applies the complex innovation implementation framework to understand the challenges and facilitators associated with the ACO implementation process. We conducted four case studies of private sector ACOs, selected to achieve variation in terms of geography and organizational maturity. Across sites, we used semistructured interviews with 68 key informants to elicit information regarding ACO implementation. Our analysis found challenges and facilitators across all domains in the conceptual framework. Notably, our findings deviated from the framework in two ways. First, findings from the financial resource availability domain revealed both financial and nonfinancial (i.e., labor) resources that contributed to implementation effectiveness. Second, a new domain, patient engagement, emerged as an important factor in implementation effectiveness. We present these deviations in an adapted framework. As the ACO model proliferates, these findings can support implementation efforts, and they highlight the importance of focusing on patients throughout the process. Importantly, this study extends the complex innovation implementation framework to incorporate consumers into the implementation framework, making it more patient centered and aiding future efforts.
More Related Videos
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide...
Healthcare Agencies I