Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Abdominopelvic CT Using Iterative (AIDR 3D) and Conventional
Caroline Duarte de Mello-Amoedo1, Aparecido Nakano Martins1, Adriano Tachibana1
11 Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, 627 Albert Einstein Ave, São Paulo, SP 05651-901, Brasil.
Objective:
The purpose of this study is to compare radiation dose and image quality of abdominopelvic CT studies reconstructed with iterative and conventional techniques.
Materials And Methods:
This retrospective study enrolled 99 patients who underwent abdominopelvic CT examinations with the portal venous phase images reconstructed with both filtered back projection and Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) at different time points. Subjective assessment of image quality was performed by two radiologists who scored axial images for overall quality, sharpness, noise, and acceptability in a blinded fashion. The SD of the mean attenuation of the liver, aorta, and paraspinal muscle (as a measurement of image noise) and contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios for liver and aorta were used as objective parameters of image quality. Radiation dose parameters included CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), dose-length product, effective dose (ED), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Results were compared for different body mass index (BMI; weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) categories. Paired t test and McNemar paired tests for noninferiority were used, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results:
We obtained a 62.5% mean reduction in CTDIvol, a 58% mean reduction in ED, and a 63% mean reduction in SSDE when AIDR 3D was used (p < 0.001). Subjective parameters of image quality were considered noninferior for AIDR 3D studies compared with filtered back projection (p < 0.001), except for the sharpness of images of patients with BMI 20-24.9. Variable results were found regarding objective assessment of image quality.
Conclusion:
AIDR 3D allowed a significant reduction in radiation dose of abdominopelvic CT examinations without a loss of image quality in general.
More Related Videos
12:32Image Rendering Techniques in Postmortem Computed Tomography: Evaluation of Biological Health and Profile in Stranded Cetaceans
Published on: September 27, 2020
09:57Development and Evaluation of 3D-Printed Cardiovascular Phantoms for Interventional Planning and Training
Published on: January 18, 2021
Related Concept Videos
01:27Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
01:10Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
01:30Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
01:14Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...