Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How sensitive are immunometric assays for thyrotropin?

M G McConway1, R S Chapman, G H Beastall

  • 1Scottish Antibody Production Unit, Law Hospital, Lanarkshire, U.K.

Clinical Chemistry
|February 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Current and Emerging Biomarkers and Imaging Modalities for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Clinical and Research Applications.

Clinical therapeutics·2021
Same author

Search for Coherent Elastic Scattering of Solar ^{8}B Neutrinos in the XENON1T Dark Matter Experiment.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of migrants to Ireland presenting with a first episode of psychosis.

Irish journal of psychological medicine·2021
Same author

Multiscale three-dimensional imaging of intact human organs down to the cellular scale using hierarchical phase-contrast tomography.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2021
Same author

Evaluation of an exercise physiology service in a youth mental health service.

Irish journal of psychological medicine·2020
Same author

Concordance in the reporting of intimate partner violence among male-male couples.

Journal of family violence·2020
Same journal

Comparison of Information-Dependent Acquisition and Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra for Untargeted Drug Testing on a Linear Ion Trap-Pulsing Quadrupole-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometer.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Patterns of One-Year Change in HbA1c and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Metrics in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

TSH Pediatric Reference Intervals: Lack of CALIPER Applicability to US-Based Populations.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Rapid Detection of Hemoglobinopathy Variants Using One-Step Library Preparation and Nanopore Sequencing.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Editor's Note: Circulating Proteolytic Products of Carboxypeptidase N for Early Detection of Breast Cancer.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

In Reply to Reflexing NT-proBNP for sFlt-1/PlGF Ratios That Fall into the Measurement Uncertainty for Preeclampsia Risk Classification.

Clinical chemistry·2026
See all related articles

The minimum detection limit offers a more accurate measure of thyrotropin assay performance at low concentrations than traditional sensitivity calculations. This reflects real-world laboratory practices better.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Immunoassay Development
  • Analytical Toxicology

Background:

  • Traditional "sensitivity" for thyrotropin immunometric assays relies on zero analyte standard analysis.
  • This method estimates intra-assay errors but doesn't reflect routine analytical practice, typically duplicate analysis.
  • Current sensitivity metrics may not accurately represent assay performance in real-world clinical settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the analytical performance of 10 routine thyrotropin immunometric assays.
  • To compare the conventional "sensitivity" measure with a "minimum detection limit" derived from routine analytical conditions.
  • To determine a more meaningful metric for assay performance at low thyrotropin concentrations.

Main Methods:

  • Collected response data from 10 thyrotropin immunometric assays.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculated "sensitivity" using multireplicate analysis of the zero analyte standard.
  • Determined "minimum detection limit" based on a minimum of 500 duplicate analyses simulating routine performance.
  • Compared the two metrics for their relevance to clinical practice.

    • Main Results:

    • "Sensitivity" estimates, while statistically valid for scatter, do not reflect typical laboratory analysis (e.g., duplicate testing).
    • The "minimum detection limit" provides an estimate directly related to errors encountered during routine assay performance.
    • Data indicated significant differences between the two measures, particularly at low analyte levels.

    Conclusions:

    • The "minimum detection limit" is a more clinically relevant and meaningful measure of thyrotropin assay performance at low concentrations.
    • Promoting the "minimum detection limit" will enhance the accurate interpretation of thyrotropin assay results in clinical practice.
    • Assay validation should incorporate metrics that reflect actual laboratory usage and error profiles.