Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Genetic Profiling for Fluorouracil Response in Gastric Cancer
Published on: May 10, 2024
Genotype-based selection of treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (SETICC): a pharmacogenetic-based
A Abad1, E Martínez-Balibrea2, J M Viéitez3
1Medical Oncology Service, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain.
Background:
There has been little progress toward personalized therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). TYMS-3' untranslated region (UTR) 6 bp ins/del and ERCC1-118C/T polymorphisms were previously reported to facilitate selecting patients for fluoropyrimidine-based treatment in combination with oxaliplatin as first-line therapy. We assessed the utility of these markers in selecting therapy for patients with mCRC.
Patients And Methods:
This randomized, open-label phase II trial compared bevacizumab plus XELOX (control) versus treatment tailored according to TYMS-3'UTR 6 bp ins/del and ERCC1-118C/T polymorphisms. Patients randomized to the experimental treatment received bevacizumab plus FUOX, FUIRI, XELIRI, or XELOX depending on their combination of favorable polymorphisms for FUOX treatment (TYMS-3'UTR ins/del or del/del; ERCC1-118T/T). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point.
Results:
Overall, 195 patients were randomized (control n = 65; experimental n = 130). The primary objective was not met: median PFS was 9.4 months in the control group and 10.1 months in the experimental group (P = 0.745). Median overall survival was similar in both groups (16.5 versus 19.1 months, respectively; P = 0.797). Patients in the experimental group had a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR; 65% versus 47% in the control group; P = 0.042) and R0 resection rate (86% versus 44%, respectively; P = 0.018). Neuropathy, hand-foot syndrome, thrombocytopenia, and dysesthesia were significantly less common in the experimental group.
Conclusions:
This study did not show survival benefits after treatment personalization based on polymorphisms in mCRC. However, the improved ORR and R0 resection rate and fewer disabling toxicities suggest that tailoring therapy by TYMS-3'UTR and ERCC1-118 polymorphisms warrants further investigation in patients with mCRC.
Clinicaltrials.Gov:
NCT01071655.
Insights
Personalizing metastatic colorectal cancer therapy using TYMS and ERCC1 polymorphisms did not improve survival. However, tailored treatment showed higher response rates and fewer toxicities, warranting further study.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacogenomics
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Personalized therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains challenging.
- TYMS-3' untranslated region (UTR) and ERCC1-118C/T polymorphisms may guide fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin selection.
- This study evaluated these polymorphisms for treatment selection in mCRC patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the utility of TYMS-3'UTR and ERCC1-118C/T polymorphisms in tailoring first-line therapy for mCRC.
- To compare progression-free survival (PFS) between a control group and an experimental group receiving personalized treatment.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, open-label phase II trial involving 195 mCRC patients.
- Control group received bevacizumab plus XELOX.
- Experimental group received bevacizumab plus FUOX, FUIRI, XELIRI, or XELOX based on TYMS and ERCC1 polymorphisms.
Main Results:
- The primary endpoint (PFS) was not met; median PFS was 9.4 months (control) vs. 10.1 months (experimental).
- Overall survival was similar between groups.
- The experimental group showed a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) and R0 resection rate, with reduced toxicity.
Conclusions:
- Treatment personalization based on TYMS and ERCC1 polymorphisms did not improve survival in mCRC.
- Improved ORR, R0 resection rates, and reduced toxicity suggest potential for further investigation.
- Tailoring therapy by these polymorphisms warrants further research in mCRC patients.
More Related Videos
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
09:29Development and Maintenance of a Preclinical Patient Derived Tumor Xenograft Model for the Investigation of Novel Anti-Cancer Therapies
Published on: September 30, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Metabolism: Overview
Pharmacogenetics of Phase I Enzymes: Cytochrome P450 Isozymes
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Enzymes: N-acetyltransferase, Thiopurine S-methyltransferase, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase