Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Regulation01:25

Self-Regulation

281
Self-regulation, also known as self-control, encompasses a range of cognitive and behavioral processes that allow individuals to adjust their internal states and outward actions to align with socially acceptable norms and long-term goals. It plays a fundamental role in adaptive functioning, from resisting impulsive behaviors to persisting through challenging tasks. While its benefits are widely recognized, self-regulation is not limitless. Muraven and Baumeister's theory posits that...
281
Fixed Action Patterns01:06

Fixed Action Patterns

17.8K
A fixed action pattern (FAP) is a specific, hard-wired sequence of behaviors that occurs in response to an external stimulus, called a sign stimulus. The behavior is “fixed” because it is essentially unchangeable—proceeding similarly across individuals of a species every time it occurs.
17.8K
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

274
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
274
Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

765
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
765

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Local and global control adjustments to stimulus-based task conflict in task switching.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023
Same author

N-2 Repetition Costs in Task Switching: Task Inhibition or Interference Between Task Episodes?

Journal of cognition·2022
Same author

On the reliability of behavioral measures of cognitive control: retest reliability of task-inhibition effect, task-preparation effect, Stroop-like interference, and conflict adaptation effect.

Psychological research·2021
Same author

Positive and negative action-effects improve task-switching performance.

Acta psychologica·2021
Same author

Errors in task switching: Investigating error aftereffects in a N-2 repetition cost paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2021
Same author

Interplay of morphological configuration and language switching in numerical processing and word processing.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking
07:00

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Published on: April 30, 2020

2.3K

Action control in task switching: do action effects modulate N - 2 repetition costs in task switching?

Stefanie Schuch1, Angelika Sommer2, Sarah Lukas2

  • 1Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Jägerstr. 17-19, 52066, Aachen, Germany. schuch@psych.rwth-aachen.de.

Psychological Research
|November 18, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Task-contingent action effects may reduce inhibitory control during task switching. This study found that experiencing these effects decreased N-2 repetition costs, suggesting less task inhibition in multitasking scenarios.

Keywords:
Action effectsIdeomotor theoryN − 2 repetition costsTask switching

More Related Videos

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

4.1K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

11.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking
07:00

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Published on: April 30, 2020

2.3K
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

4.1K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

11.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Ideomotor theory suggests actions are guided by anticipated effects.
  • Response-contingent action effects influence performance in reaction time tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate if task-contingent action effects impact N-2 repetition costs in task switching.
  • Determine if these effects reduce between-task interference and inhibitory control.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a task-switching paradigm with two groups: experimental (task-contingent effects) and control (non-contingent effects).
  • Compared N-2 repetition costs across blocks of trials, analyzing both error rates and reaction times.

Main Results:

  • A significant three-way interaction indicated differential patterns between groups.
  • The experimental group showed increased N-2 repetition costs in the final block, unlike the control group.
  • Reaction time data showed a similar trend, though not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

  • Task-contingent action effects appear to reduce task inhibition during task switching.
  • Further research is needed to fully understand the role of action effects in multitasking performance.