Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.8K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.8K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.4K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.4K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

4.0K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Nursing Ethical Principles II01:27

Nursing Ethical Principles II

2.3K
Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
2.3K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

488
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
488

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

'Take my kidneys but not my corneas'-Selective preferences as a hidden problem for 'opt-out' organ donation policy.

Bioethics·2022
Same author

The case against meta-consent: not only do Ploug and Holm not <i>answer</i> it, they make it <i>even stronger</i>.

Journal of medical ethics·2019
Same author

The ethics of biobanking: Assessing the right to control problem for broad consent.

Bioethics·2019
Same author

The biobank consent debate: Why 'meta-consent' is not the solution?

Journal of medical ethics·2018
Same author

When is a Choice not a Choice? 'Sham Offers' and the Asymmetry of Adolescent Consent and Refusal.

Bioethics·2016
Same author

Transitional paternalism: how shared normative powers give rise to the asymmetry of adolescent consent and refusal.

Bioethics·2014
Same journal

Zygotes are Persisting Organisms.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Ethical Examination of Genetic Enhancement from the Perspective of Confucian Human Dignity.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Reproducing Anachronism: Ageing, Fertility and Inequality in Reproductive Governance.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Genetic Moral Enhancement-A View Based on Mencius' Theory of Human Nature.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Egalitarian Justice and the Prevalence Principle in Human Genome Editing.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

"It's Shaking Your Entire Construction as a Human Being": A Qualitative Analysis on Epistemic Injustice and Medical Gaslighting Consequences in Patients Living with Chronic Pain.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.4K

Misleading by Omission: Rethinking the Obligation to Inform Research Subjects about Funding Sources.

Neil C Manson1

  • 1Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|November 18, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Informed consent for medical research should not require disclosing funding sources, as this creates an "informational fallacy." A better approach focuses on preventing misleading omissions, protecting participant interests without unnecessary disclosure.

Keywords:
Declaration of Helsinkidisclosureinformed consentobligation to informresearch ethics

More Related Videos

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.6K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.4K
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.6K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.6K

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Research Ethics
  • Informed Consent Law

Background:

  • Informed consent requirements in medical research have evolved significantly over 50 years.
  • The Declaration of Helsinki mandates informing subjects about research funding sources.
  • Current disclosure requirements may be problematic and irrelevant to consent decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the

Main Methods:

  • Critique of the current obligation to disclose funding sources in informed consent.
  • Development of an alternative ethical framework based on the principle of avoiding misleading omissions.
  • Philosophical analysis of ethical obligations in human subjects research.

Main Results:

  • The obligation to disclose funding sources in informed consent is identified as an "informational fallacy."
  • An alternative approach, grounded in the general obligation to refrain from misleading by omission, is proposed.
  • This alternative approach protects subjects' interests without the identified fallacy.

Conclusions:

  • The current mandate to disclose funding sources in informed consent is ethically flawed.
  • An obligation to avoid misleading by omission offers a more robust ethical basis for protecting research participants.
  • This revised ethical norm enhances participant protection in medical research.