Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

361
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
361
Impact of Groups on Individuals01:28

Impact of Groups on Individuals

386
Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
386
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

95.6K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
95.6K
Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

414
Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...
414
Impact of Social Context on Individuals01:21

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

356
Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
356
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

265
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
265

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stanley Sue (1944-2024).

The American psychologist·2025
Same author

Anti-Asian biases in federal grant reviews: Commentary on Yip et al. (2021).

The American psychologist·2024
Same author

Cultural Inertia: Framework of Change and Intergroup Relations.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2022
Same author

Racial trauma: Theory, research, and healing: Introduction to the special issue.

The American psychologist·2019
Same author

A Meta-Analysis of Latinx Acculturation and Intimate Partner Violence.

Trauma, violence & abuse·2018
Same author

When "They" Become "Us": The Effect of Time and Ingroup Identity on Perceptions of Gay and Lesbian Group Members.

Journal of homosexuality·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 18, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.6K

Researchers of Color, Fame, and Impact.

Michael A Zárate1, Gordon Nagayama Hall2, Victoria C Plaut3

  • 11 Department of Psychology, University of Texas at El Paso.

Perspectives on Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science
|November 18, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Traditional measures of academic impact focus on publications and social networks. This study expands the definition to include societal impact, such as mentoring and policy influence, addressing the underrepresentation of researchers of color.

Keywords:
diversityfameimpact

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Allergic Rhinitis Research with Multicolor Immunofluorescence
06:08

Author Spotlight: Advancing Allergic Rhinitis Research with Multicolor Immunofluorescence

Published on: September 22, 2023

2.6K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 18, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.6K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Allergic Rhinitis Research with Multicolor Immunofluorescence
06:08

Author Spotlight: Advancing Allergic Rhinitis Research with Multicolor Immunofluorescence

Published on: September 22, 2023

2.6K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Academia
  • Sociology of Science
  • Research Impact

Background:

  • Traditional metrics for academic fame and eminence primarily focus on publication counts and social network connections (e.g., editorial boards).
  • These conventional measures often overlook the broader societal influence and real-world changes stemming from research.
  • Existing frameworks fail to adequately recognize contributions like mentorship and policy impact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To broaden the definition of academic impact beyond traditional metrics of fame and eminence.
  • To introduce societal impact as a crucial, yet often neglected, dimension of research influence.
  • To examine these expanded definitions in the context of the underrepresentation of researchers of color in academia.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of existing frameworks for measuring academic eminence.
  • Identification and definition of novel impact dimensions: mentorship and policy value.
  • Discussion of the implications of these expanded metrics for diversity in academia.

Main Results:

  • Societal impact, encompassing mentorship and policy influence, offers a more comprehensive view of research contributions.
  • Traditional measures inadequately capture the full spectrum of academic influence.
  • Expanding impact definitions is critical for understanding and addressing disparities faced by underrepresented researchers.

Conclusions:

  • Redefining academic impact to include societal contributions is essential for a more equitable and accurate assessment of research.
  • Mentorship and policy influence represent significant forms of impact that should be recognized.
  • A broader definition of impact can help illuminate and potentially mitigate the underrepresentation of researchers of color in academia.