Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview01:12

Double Resonance Techniques: Overview

790
Double resonance techniques in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy involve the simultaneous application of two different frequencies or radiofrequency pulses to manipulate and observe two distinct nuclear spins. One important application of double resonance is spin decoupling, which selectively suppresses coupling with one type of nucleus while observing the NMR signal from another nucleus, simplifying the spectrum and enhancing resolution.
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
790
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.7K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.7K
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview01:03

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview

2.1K
NMR-active nuclei have energy levels called 'spin states' that are associated with the orientations of their nuclear magnetic moments. In the absence of a magnetic field, the nuclear magnetic moments are randomly oriented, and the spin states are degenerate. When an external magnetic field is applied, the spin states have only 2 + 1 orientations available to them. A proton with = ½ has two available orientations. Similarly, for a quadrupolar nucleus with a nuclear spin value of one, the...
2.1K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.6K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Probing non-ergodicity and symmetry via direct measurement of coherent scattering in a shaken rotor.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Optimal Floquet state engineering for large scale atom interferometers.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Optimal synchronization to a limit cycle.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

Hamiltonian Ratchet for Matter-Wave Transport.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Accuracy of neural networks for the simulation of chaotic dynamics: Precision of training data vs precision of the algorithm.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2020
Same author

Chaos-assisted tunneling resonances in a synthetic Floquet superlattice.

Science advances·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
08:03

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy

Published on: April 13, 2022

2.6K

Reverse engineering protocols for controlling spin dynamics.

Qi Zhang1,2,3, Xi Chen4, D Guéry-Odelin5,6

  • 1Shanghai University, Department of Physics, Shanghai, 200444, P. R. China.

Scientific Reports
|November 19, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces novel reverse engineering protocols to precisely control magnetic fields for manipulating single and multiple spins efficiently. These methods enable robust spin control and the creation of entangled states, advancing quantum technologies.

More Related Videos

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

5.2K
Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
08:03

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy

Published on: April 13, 2022

2.6K
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

5.2K
Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.5K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum physics and control
  • Magnetic resonance
  • Quantum information science

Background:

  • Precise control over quantum systems like electron spins is crucial for quantum technologies.
  • Manipulating spins using external fields is a fundamental challenge in quantum control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop reverse engineering protocols for shaping magnetic fields.
  • To demonstrate manipulation of single and multiple spins (independent and interacting).
  • To establish protocols robust against parameter uncertainties and generate entangled states.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing reverse engineering techniques to design time-dependent magnetic field pulses.
  • Applying protocols to systems with one spin, two independent spins with varying gyromagnetic factors, and two interacting spins.
  • Developing strategies for parameter-robust control and entanglement generation.

Main Results:

  • Successful manipulation of single and multiple spins in short timeframes.
  • Demonstration of protocols resilient to imprecise knowledge of gyromagnetic factors.
  • Generation of entangled states for coupled spin systems via dipole-dipole interactions.

Conclusions:

  • The developed reverse engineering protocols offer efficient and robust methods for spin manipulation.
  • These techniques are applicable to fundamental quantum control problems and the creation of entangled states for quantum information processing.