Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

18.8K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
18.8K
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

1.2K
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
1.2K
DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

21.4K
Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...
21.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

oriGen cohort: a Mexican population-based epidemiological and genomic research platform.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2025
Same author

Systematic Modeling of Risk-Associated Copy Number Alterations in Cancer.

International journal of molecular sciences·2024
Same author

CoGTEx: Unscaled system-level coexpression estimation from GTEx data forecast novel functional gene partners.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Distinguishing pathophysiological features of heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction: A comparative analysis of two mouse models.

The Journal of physiology·2024
Same author

The Impact of Mutational Hotspots on Cancer Survival.

Cancers·2024
Same author

Heterozygous Knockout of <i>ARID4B</i> Using CRISPR/Cas9 Attenuates Some Aggressive Phenotypes in a Breast Cancer Cell Line.

Genes·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

4.0K

Metrics to estimate differential co-expression networks.

Elpidio-Emmanuel Gonzalez-Valbuena1, Víctor Treviño1

  • 1Cátedra de Bioinformática, Escuela de Medicina, Tecnológico de Monterrey, 64710 Monterrey, Nuevo León Mexico.

Biodata Mining
|November 21, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Differential correlation analysis helps uncover molecular mechanisms. This study introduces a method to evaluate metrics, finding that those not filtering correlations generally perform best for gene expression data.

Keywords:
Data simulationDifferential correlationNetworks

More Related Videos

High-Throughput Transcriptome Analysis for Investigating Host-Pathogen Interactions
14:58

High-Throughput Transcriptome Analysis for Investigating Host-Pathogen Interactions

Published on: March 5, 2022

4.8K
Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
10:10

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

41.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

4.0K
High-Throughput Transcriptome Analysis for Investigating Host-Pathogen Interactions
14:58

High-Throughput Transcriptome Analysis for Investigating Host-Pathogen Interactions

Published on: March 5, 2022

4.8K
Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
10:10

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

41.7K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Gene expression data analysis is crucial for understanding molecular mechanisms.
  • Differential correlation analysis offers deeper insights beyond differentially expressed genes.
  • A lack of standardized metrics and implementations hinders differential correlation analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of novel and existing metrics for detecting differential correlations.
  • To evaluate metric performance using controlled datasets and real tumor data.
  • To address uncertainties in differential correlation analysis due to varied metrics and real-data limitations.

Main Methods:

  • Generation of well-controlled datasets with introduced correlation differences using multivariate normal networks and noise.
  • Comparison of six metrics (four novel, two existing) for differential correlation detection.
  • Analysis on three real tumor datasets and TCGA breast cancer subtypes.

Main Results:

  • Metrics exhibit varying detection performance and computational times.
  • No single metric outperformed all others across all datasets.
  • Three metrics demonstrated high correlation and suitability for real-world analysis, outperforming others.
  • Metrics that do not filter correlations generally showed better performance.

Conclusions:

  • A methodology for generating controlled datasets for objective evaluation of differential correlation pipelines was established.
  • A comparative performance analysis of several differential correlation metrics was conducted.
  • An R package, DifCoNet, was developed to facilitate differential correlation analyses.