Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

13.8K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.8K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.8K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.8K
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

3.0K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
3.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Outliers and Influential Points01:08

Outliers and Influential Points

6.4K
An outlier is an observation of data that does not fit the rest of the data. It is sometimes called an extreme value. When you graph an outlier, it will appear not to fit the pattern of the graph. Some outliers are due to mistakes (for example, writing down 50 instead of 500), while others may indicate that something unusual is happening. Outliers are present far from the least squares line in the vertical direction. They have large "errors," where the "error" or residual is the...
6.4K
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

2.1K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
2.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Crowdfunding scientific research: Descriptive insights and correlates of funding success.

PloS one·2019
Same author

Did relaxing clinical trial regulation enhance the stock of scientific knowledge in India? Not necessarily.

PloS one·2019
Same author

Prepublication disclosure of scientific results: Norms, competition, and commercial orientation.

Science advances·2018
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 18, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.6K

Authorship and contribution disclosures.

Henry Sauermann1,2,3, Carolin Haeussler4

  • 1ESMT Berlin, Berlin 10178, Germany.

Science Advances
|November 21, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Author order in scientific papers is unreliable for determining contributions, especially in large teams. New contribution statements offer limited improvement and have varied use among researchers.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mitochondrial Contact Sites and Architectural Insights
07:55

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mitochondrial Contact Sites and Architectural Insights

Published on: June 16, 2023

2.1K
Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 18, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.6K
Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mitochondrial Contact Sites and Architectural Insights
07:55

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mitochondrial Contact Sites and Architectural Insights

Published on: June 16, 2023

2.1K
Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Scientific communication
  • Research integrity

Background:

  • Author order has traditionally indicated scientific contributions.
  • Increasing concerns about authorship accuracy have led journals to adopt contribution disclosure policies.
  • The effectiveness and usage of these new contribution statements are not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reliability of author order for inferring contributions.
  • To analyze how author contribution statements are created and utilized by researchers.
  • To compare author order and contribution statements in scientific publications.

Main Methods:

  • Bibliometric analysis of over 12,000 articles to compare author order and contribution statements.
  • Survey analysis of over 6,000 corresponding authors on the writing and use of contribution statements.
  • Development of a conceptual model to guide the analysis of author contributions.

Main Results:

  • Inaccuracies in inferring contributions from author order increase with team size and specific author types.
  • Contribution statements do not fully capture all aspects of contribution value reflected in author order.
  • Significant variations exist in how contribution statements are written and perceived across different scientific fields and career stages.

Conclusions:

  • Author order is an increasingly unreliable indicator of individual scientific contributions.
  • Current contribution statements have limitations and are not universally utilized or understood.
  • Further research is needed to improve authorship attribution and the utility of contribution disclosures.