Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic aortic dissections
Allan M Conway1, Khalil Qato1, Laurie R Mondry1
1Department of Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY.
Insights
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) shows promising midterm results for chronic type B aortic dissection (cTBD) with aneurysm, demonstrating acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Further long-term studies are necessary to confirm the durability of this endovascular approach.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Endovascular Interventions
- Aortic Disease Management
Background:
- Open surgical repair is the standard for chronic type B aortic dissection (cTBD) with aneurysm.
- Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is increasingly used for thoracic aortic diseases, including cTBD.
- This study evaluates TEVAR effectiveness for cTBD using the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness and outcomes of TEVAR in patients with chronic type B aortic dissection and aneurysm.
- To analyze perioperative complications, reinterventions, and midterm sac diameter changes following TEVAR for cTBD.
- To compare TEVAR outcomes against established standards for thoracic aortic repair.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 125 TEVAR procedures for cTBD from the VQI registry (July 2010 - November 2015).
- Evaluation of procedural success, endoleaks, perioperative complications (stroke, respiratory, spinal cord ischemia), and in-hospital mortality.
- Assessment of midterm sac diameter changes and reintervention rates at follow-up.
Main Results:
- Successful device delivery in 98.4% of cases, with low conversion to open repair (0.8%).
- Perioperative complications included stroke (0.8%), respiratory issues (4.8%), and spinal cord ischemia (2.4%); in-hospital mortality was 2.4%.
- Midterm follow-up showed a median sac diameter decrease of -0.2 cm, with shrinkage observed in 27.9% of patients; larger aneurysms (≥5.5 cm) were more likely to shrink.
Conclusions:
- TEVAR for cTBD can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates.
- Midterm sac diameter changes following TEVAR are encouraging.
- Long-term data are required to establish the durability of TEVAR for chronic type B aortic dissection.
Background:
Open surgical repair remains the "gold standard" treatment for chronic type B aortic dissection (cTBD) with aneurysm. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has gained popularity in recent years for the treatment of thoracic aortic diseases, including cTBD. We assessed the effectiveness of TEVAR in the treatment of cTBD using the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database.
Methods:
The VQI registry identified 4713 patients treated with TEVAR from July 2010 to November 2015, including 125 repairs for cTBD. We analyzed TEVAR outcomes in this cohort per the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards for TEVAR.
Results:
Median age was 65.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56.0-72.0 years), and 85 (68.0%) were male. Median aneurysm diameter was 5.5 cm (IQR, 4.8-6.3 cm). Sixty-two (49.6%) patients were asymptomatic on presentation, 57 (45.6%) were symptomatic, and 6 (4.8%) presented with rupture. Median length of stay was 8.0 days (IQR, 4.0-11.0 days). Fluoroscopy time was 17.3 minutes (IQR, 10.5-25.6 minutes). The distal landing zone was aortic zone 4 in 27 (21.6%) and aortic zone 5 and distal in 98 (78.4%) patients. Successful device delivery occurred in 123 (98.4%) patients. Conversion to open repair occurred in one (0.8%) patient. A type IA endoleak was present in 2 (1.6%), type IB endoleak in 2 (1.6%), and type II endoleak in 2 (1.6%) patients. Perioperative complications included stroke in 1 (0.8%), respiratory complications in 6 (4.8%), and spinal cord ischemia symptoms present at discharge in 3 (2.4%) patients. In-hospital mortality occurred in three (2.4%) patients. Reintervention was required in two (1.6%) patients for false lumen perfusion and in two (1.6%) patients for extension of the dissection. Follow-up was available for 43 patients at a median time of 239 days (IQR, 38-377 days). Median change in sac diameter was -0.2 cm (IQR, -0.5 to 0.1 cm). Sac shrinkage of 0.5 cm was noted in 12 (27.9%), with sac growth >0.5 cm in four (9.3%) patients. Extent of stent graft coverage did not affect sac shrinkage (P = .65). Patients with aneurysms ≥5.5 cm compared with <5.5 cm were more likely to demonstrate shrinkage (-0.6 cm vs 0.0 cm; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-11.7; P = .04).
Conclusions:
TEVAR for cTBD may be performed with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality. Changes in sac diameter in the midterm are promising. Long-term data are needed to determine whether this approach is durable.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
