Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Stable Phantom Material for Optical and Acoustic Imaging
Published on: June 16, 2023
Proton range verification in homogeneous materials through acoustic measurements
Wei Nie1, Kevin C Jones2, Scott Petro1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Protoacoustics offers a simple method for proton beam range verification. This technique uses sound waves generated by proton dose deposition to accurately measure the Bragg peak depth, aiding quality assurance.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Acoustics
- Radiation Oncology
Background:
- Clinical proton beam therapy requires precise quality assurance (QA) for accurate dose delivery.
- Measuring the Bragg peak (BP) depth is crucial for proton beam range verification.
- Current methods for BP depth measurement can be complex or costly.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate protoacoustics as a simple and accurate method for measuring proton beam Bragg peak depth.
- To compare different signal analysis methods for protoacoustic measurements.
- To assess the feasibility of protoacoustics for clinical quality assurance in proton therapy.
Main Methods:
- Proton beam experiments were conducted using rectangular and cylindrical phantoms made of aluminum, lead, and polyethylene.
- Protoacoustic signals, generated by proton dose deposition, were measured.
- Four distinct methods were employed to analyze the protoacoustic signals and determine BP depth.
- Psuedospectral wave-equation simulations (k-Wave MATLAB toolbox) were used to model acoustic reflections.
Main Results:
- Method 4 demonstrated minimal error (<3 mm, uncertainty ≤1.5 mm) across all tested materials and geometries.
- Plastic phantoms yielded better accuracy than metallic ones with Methods 1 and 2 due to lower sound speed.
- Method 3, while not requiring material-specific sound speed characterization, resulted in the largest error.
- Simulations helped elucidate the origin of acoustic reflections within phantoms.
Conclusions:
- Protoacoustic measurements show promise as a low-cost, simple QA procedure for proton beam range verification.
- The accuracy of protoacoustics is dependent on the choice of phantom materials and signal analysis methods.
- Method 4 provides a highly accurate approach for BP depth determination using protoacoustics.
- Further implementation of protoacoustics could enhance efficiency and simplicity in clinical proton therapy QA.
More Related Videos
07:44Characterization of Full Set Material Constants and Their Temperature Dependence for Piezoelectric Materials Using Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy
Published on: April 27, 2016
09:10The Frequency Domain Thermoreflectance Technique for Thermal Property Measurements
Published on: December 5, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Proton (¹H) NMR: Chemical Shift
Absorption signals of all the protium nuclei...
¹H NMR Chemical Shift Equivalence: Homotopic and Heterotopic Protons
2D NMR: Overview of Homonuclear Correlation Techniques
COSY90 is the standard two-dimensional (2D) COSY experiment that...
¹H NMR of Labile Protons: Deuterium (²H) Substitution
¹H NMR of Labile Protons: Temporal Resolution
The –OH proton in alcohols typically appears in the range of δ 2 to 5 ppm but can vary depending on the specific...
2D NMR: Overview of Heteronuclear Correlation Techniques