Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

10:20
Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
Published on: March 12, 2013
14.0K
Predator Persistence through Variability of Resource Productivity in Tritrophic Systems
The American Naturalist
|November 23, 2017
Summary
Resource variability can surprisingly boost predator populations in food webs. By reducing competition among prey, variability increases food availability for predators, enhancing trophic transfer efficiency in ecosystems.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Ecological modeling
- Food web dynamics
Background:
- Trophic structure and energy transfer are crucial for community stability.
- Primary productivity fluctuations challenge higher trophic levels, but variability effects are understudied beyond simple food chains.
- Understanding resource variability impacts is key to predicting ecosystem resilience.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of resource productivity variability on a three-level food chain (resource, consumer, predator).
- To model predator persistence and trophic transfer efficiency under fluctuating resource conditions.
- To incorporate size-structuring and body-size-dependent energetics into the model.
Main Methods:
- Development of a tritrophic model adhering to mass conservation.
- Inclusion of size-structured prey and size-specific predation.
- Simulation of varying resource productivity and analysis of resulting population dynamics and energy transfer.
Main Results:
- Resource variability can unexpectedly enhance predator persistence.
- Increased variability leads to starvation mortality in juvenile prey, reducing intraspecific competition.
- This reduced competition increases prey availability for predators within their preferred size range.
Conclusions:
- Environmental variability, particularly in resource productivity, can sustain species at higher trophic levels.
- The model demonstrates that realistic body-size-dependent functions are critical for understanding variability's effects.
- Findings suggest that ecological complexity and size-structuring mediate the impact of environmental fluctuations on food webs.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
21.8K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
21.8K
Trophic Efficiency
25.4K
Trophic level transfer efficiency (TLTE) is a measure of the total energy transfer from one trophic level to the next. Due to extensive energy loss as metabolic heat, an average of only 10% of the original energy obtained is passed on to the next level. This pattern of energy loss severely limits the possible number of trophic levels in a food chain.
25.4K
Optimal Foraging
14.0K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.0K
Life Histories
23.0K
Overview
23.0K
Energy Budgets
10.9K
Organisms must balance energy intake with the energy required for growth, maintenance and reproduction. These trade-offs result in a variety of survivorship and reproductive strategies, including semelparity and iteroparity. Semelparous species, like annual plants, have only one reproductive episode in their lifetimes and consequently have short lifespans. Iteroparous species, by contrast, have many reproductive events during their lifetimes but have relatively few offspring. These two...
10.9K
Production Efficiency
18.7K
Net production efficiency (NPE) is the efficiency at which organisms assimilate energy into biomass for the next trophic level. Due to low metabolic rates and less energy spent on thermoregulatory processes, the NPE of ectotherms (cold-blooded animals) is 10 times higher than endotherms (warm-blooded animals).
18.7K

