Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

11:17
Surgical Technique for the Implantation of Tissue Engineered Vascular Grafts and Subsequent In Vivo Monitoring
Published on: April 3, 2015
12.3K
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Korean Expert Panel Report.
Jung Min Ahn1, Duk Woo Park1, Sung Jin Hong2
1Heart Institute, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Korean Circulation Journal
|November 25, 2017
Summary
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) offer advantages over metallic stents but raise safety concerns. This review addresses BRS efficacy and suggests optimal patient selection, implantation techniques, and management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) are designed to provide temporary support and drug delivery, degrading into harmless byproducts.
- Unlike metallic drug-eluting stents (DESs), BRS aim to avoid long-term complications.
- Recent clinical data have highlighted safety and efficacy concerns regarding first-generation BRS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the existing clinical evidence on the safety and efficacy of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BRS) implantation.
- To provide guidance on optimal practices for BRS use, addressing patient and lesion selection, implantation techniques, and post-procedure management.
- To establish appropriate criteria for BRS application in the absence of long-term Korean clinical data.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of randomized trials and registry studies on BRS.
- Analysis of clinical outcomes, including safety and efficacy endpoints.
- Synthesis of evidence to formulate recommendations for clinical practice.
Main Results:
- First-generation BRS have demonstrated both potential benefits and significant clinical concerns regarding safety and efficacy.
- Limited long-term data currently exist, particularly within the Korean population.
- Variability in outcomes suggests a need for careful patient and lesion selection.
Conclusions:
- Optimal patient and lesion selection are critical for successful BRS implantation.
- Standardized implantation techniques and appropriate post-procedural management are essential to mitigate risks.
- Further research and long-term data are necessary to fully elucidate the role of BRS in cardiovascular interventions.

