Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
The emergence of the empirical stance: Children's testing of counterintuitive claims
Samuel Ronfard1, Eva E Chen2, Paul L Harris3
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University.
Abstract:
Although children often believe an adult's claims, they may have opportunities to check these claims by gathering relevant empirical evidence themselves. Here, we examine whether children seize such opportunities, especially when the claim is counterintuitive. Chinese preschool and elementary schoolchildren were presented with five different-sized Russian dolls and asked to indicate the heaviest doll. Almost all children selected the biggest doll. Half of the children then heard a false, counterintuitive claim (i.e., smallest = heaviest). The remaining children heard a claim confirming their initial intuition (i.e., biggest = heaviest). Children in both age groups typically endorsed the experimenter's claim even when it was counterintuitive. However, during the experimenter's subsequent absence, elementary schoolchildren explored the dolls more if they had received counterintuitive rather than confirming testimony whereas preschool children rarely explored, no matter what testimony they had received. Thus, with increasing age, children seize opportunities to test counterintuitive claims. (PsycINFO Database Record
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
The Nativist Approach
The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Counterfactual Thinking
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

