Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026
Murine Model of Leukemia Relapse to Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Published on: October 17, 2025
Outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia after blinatumomab failure: No change in
Elias Jabbour1, Johannes Düll2, Musa Yilmaz1
1Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Blinatumomab, a bi-specific T-cell engaging CD3-CD19 antibody construct, has shown significant activity in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Despite this improvement, most patients relapse. Here, we describe the outcome of 68 patients with R/R ALL after failure of blinatumomab therapy: 38 (56%) blinatumomab refractory; 30 (44%) relapsing after initial response. After a median follow-up of 49 months, 9 (13%) patients remained alive. The median overall survival after blinatumomab failure was 5.2 months. At the time of failure, among 61 patients evaluated for immunophenotype, 56 (92%) had CD19-positive blasts; only five (8%) had ALL recurrence with CD19-negative disease. Two patients progressed with lower CD19 expression. In summary, the outcome of patients with R/R ALL after blinatumomab failure is poor and treatment of these patients remains an unmet medical need. Our findings indicate that blinatumomab therapy would not exclude a significant number of patients from the potential benefit of subsequent CD19-directed therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.
Blinatumomab, a bi-specific T-cell engaging CD3-CD19 antibody construct, has shown significant activity in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Despite this improvement, most patients relapse. Here, we describe the outcome of 68 patients with R/R ALL after failure of blinatumomab therapy: 38 (56%) blinatumomab refractory; 30 (44%) relapsing after initial response. After a median follow-up of 49 months, 9 (13%) patients remained alive. The median overall survival after blinatumomab failure was 5.2 months. At the time of failure, among 61 patients evaluated for immunophenotype, 56 (92%) had CD19-positive blasts; only five (8%) had ALL recurrence with CD19-negative disease. Two patients progressed with lower CD19 expression. In summary, the outcome of patients with R/R ALL after blinatumomab failure is poor and treatment of these patients remains an unmet medical need. Our findings indicate that blinatumomab therapy would not exclude a significant number of patients from the potential benefit of subsequent CD19-directed therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.
