Differences in physical characteristics and sealing ability of three tricalcium silicate-based cements used as...

To evaluate differences in physical characteristics and sealing ability of root-end-fillings made with these materials compared to the gold standard (ProRoot MTA).

The physical characteristics of ProRoot MTA, Medcem MTA and Biodentine were evaluated regarding setting time, flow, film thickness, solubility and radiopacity according to the German Institute for Standardization (EN-ISO 6878). To investigate their sealing ability as root-end-fillings, a glucose penetration model was used. 60 human extracted single-rooted teeth were endodontically treated, root-end resections performed and divided in three groups of 20 teeth, using either ProRoot MTA, Medcem MTA or Biodentine as root-end-filling material. After 30 days, glucose concentrations were determined photometrically, followed by statistical analysis (Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U-test).

Biodentine showed the fastest setting time (< 12 minutes) and lowest film thickness (0.11± 0.01 mm), whereas Medcem MTA showed the best values regarding solubility (< 0.1%) and flow (9.5± 0.02 mm). ProRoot MTA revealed the highest radiopacity (7.58± 0.1 mm aluminum equivalent). The glucose leakage in the Medcem MTA group was significantly lower than in the ProRoot MTA group (P= 0.011). Biodentine showed lower leakage than ProRoot MTA (P= 0.031).

As Medcem MTA showed significantly lower leakage than the other materials tested, it may be an alternative for root-end-fillings with comparable physical characteristics to the current gold standard. With the exception of the high solubility, Biodentine performed well regarding leakage and setting time.