Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

355
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
355
Fineness Modulus01:19

Fineness Modulus

1.5K
The fineness modulus (FM) of aggregate is a numerical index that measures the coarseness or fineness of the particles. It is calculated by adding the cumulative percentages of aggregate retained on each of a specified series of sieves and dividing the sum by 100.
Consider performing sieve analysis on sand through a set of ASTM sieves. The weight of aggregate retained in each sieve and pan placed at the bottom is recorded, as given in Column B of Table 1.
To determine the fineness modulus of...
1.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

11.5K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.5K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.1K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.1K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.8K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The genome and transcriptome of Musa itinerans unveil novel candidate genes for fusaric acid resistance.

The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology·2026
Same author

Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide promotes peri-implant inflammation through neutrophil activation.

Journal of prosthodontic research·2026
Same author

Transitions in stress, depression, and self-esteem across pubertal onset in children with central precocious puberty.

Comprehensive psychiatry·2026
Same author

Prognostic indicators and microbial landscape of post-radiation nasopharyngeal necrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA·2026
Same author

Development of a Rapid Transformation and Amplification System in Byblis guehoi Unveils an Atypical Protein Secretion Pathway in Sessile Trichome Cells.

Plant & cell physiology·2026
Same author

An artificial intelligence optimized hepatic differentiation unveils NR5A2 and AP-1 transcriptional regulation in hepatic maturation.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2026
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Dual channel drug-drug interactions extraction based on cross attention.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

FeSseqdb: a curated sequence-level database and interpretable machine learning framework for identifying iron-sulfur proteins.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.6K

An efficient error correction algorithm using FM-index.

Yao-Ting Huang1, Yu-Wen Huang2

  • 1Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Chuang Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan. ythuang@cs.ccu.edu.tw.

BMC Bioinformatics
|November 29, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a novel overlap-based error correction algorithm using FM-index (FMOE) for high-throughput sequencing data. FMOE demonstrates superior correction power and speed, particularly for long reads, improving genome assembly accuracy.

Keywords:
FM-indexNext-generation sequencing

More Related Videos

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation
13:04

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation

Published on: January 18, 2022

4.9K
High Precision FRET at Single-molecule Level for Biomolecule Structure Determination
11:24

High Precision FRET at Single-molecule Level for Biomolecule Structure Determination

Published on: May 13, 2017

11.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.6K
Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation
13:04

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation

Published on: January 18, 2022

4.9K
High Precision FRET at Single-molecule Level for Biomolecule Structure Determination
11:24

High Precision FRET at Single-molecule Level for Biomolecule Structure Determination

Published on: May 13, 2017

11.3K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • High-throughput sequencing generates vast amounts of genomic data at lower costs.
  • Sequencing errors, such as mismatches and indels, can compromise the accuracy of de novo genome assembly.
  • Existing error correction methods often involve trade-offs between correction efficiency, accuracy, and computational speed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel and efficient algorithm for correcting sequencing errors prior to genome assembly.
  • To address the limitations of existing error correction methods by improving correction power, accuracy, and speed.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel overlap-based error correction algorithm named FMOE, utilizing the FM-index data structure.
  • FMOE identifies overlapping reads by aligning a query read against multiple compressed reads simultaneously.
  • Error correction is performed using k-mer voting exclusively on identified overlapping reads.

Main Results:

  • FMOE achieved the highest correction power among tested methods, with comparable accuracy and speed.
  • The algorithm demonstrated superior performance on long-read sequencing datasets compared to short-read datasets.
  • Genome assembly results indicated FMOE's effectiveness, especially for long or high-quality reads, highlighting its strengths in specific scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • FMOE offers a powerful and efficient solution for sequencing error correction in genomics.
  • The algorithm is particularly well-suited for long-read sequencing data, enhancing downstream genome assembly.
  • The FMOE algorithm is publicly available for research use.