Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Mouse
Published on: October 24, 2018
Bleeding during veno-venous ECMO cannot reliably be predicted by rotational thrombelastometry (ROTEM™)
Christina Hellmann1, Axel Schmutz1, Johannes Kalbhenn1
1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Center - Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Introduction:
Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) used for respiratory support is associated with clinical bleeding in at least one third of patients. Mechanisms promoting bleeding, like acquired von Willebrand syndrome, cannot be identified by routine coagulation tests. This study was performed to evaluate rotational Thrombelastography (ROTEM™) for specific results predicting bleeding events during vvECMO.
Methods:
Five hundred and thirty-four ROTEM™ analyses of 57 patients over 574 days have been evaluated. Patients were graded into three groups according to the severity of bleeding, following the Freiburg ECMO bleeding assessment. ROTEM™ results and basic as well as comprehensive laboratory coagulation tests have been compared among the three groups and overall between defined time points.
Results:
Fourteen patients (25 %) presented without bleeding, 22 patients (39 %) showed mild bleeding and 21 patients (36 %) became evident with relevant clinical bleeding. No bleeding shock and no fatal bleeding event occurred. No case of hyperfibrinolysis was observed. Neither a statistical difference for ECMO blood flow nor duration of therapy among the groups could be shown. The only significant difference was clotting time (CT) in the InTEM analysis, with a median (IQR) of 175 (37.5) seconds in Group 1, 190 (54.5) seconds in Group 2 and 204 (90) seconds in Group 3. When comparing overall ROTEM™ analyses between defined time points, continuous worsening of CT can be found in ExTEM, FibTEM and ApTEM. Reduced A10, A20 and congruently maximum clot firmness, especially, developed in ExTEM and ApTEM and with a minor characteristic in InTEM, but not in FibTEM. ROTEM™ and coagulation-parameter results before 19 clinical relevant bleeding episodes compared to all other results only showed differences in FibTEM.
Conclusion:
ROTEM™ as a functional viscoelastic analysis does not provide additional information to basic and comprehensive laboratory tests during vvECMO. Bleeding events cannot be predicted by the means of specific ROTEM™ results.
More Related Videos
03:40Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without Left Ventricular Venting
Published on: January 17, 2025
05:44Author Spotlight: Utilizing Venoplasty Balloon Model in Rodents to Simulate Surgical Interventions for Deep Veins
Published on: May 24, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system...