Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Mouse
Published on: October 24, 2018
Bleeding during veno-venous ECMO cannot reliably be predicted by rotational thrombelastometry (ROTEM™)
Christina Hellmann1, Axel Schmutz1, Johannes Kalbhenn1
1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Center - Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Rotational Thrombelastography (ROTEM™) did not predict bleeding events in patients undergoing veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO). Standard coagulation tests are sufficient for assessing bleeding risk in these patients.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Hematology
- Cardiopulmonary Support
Background:
- Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) is crucial for respiratory support but is associated with significant bleeding complications in over a third of patients.
- Routine coagulation tests often fail to identify mechanisms of bleeding, such as acquired von Willebrand syndrome, during vvECMO.
- Predicting and managing bleeding is a critical challenge in patients requiring vvECMO.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of rotational Thrombelastography (ROTEM™) in predicting specific bleeding events in patients undergoing vvECMO.
- To determine if ROTEM™ provides additional predictive value beyond standard coagulation tests for bleeding risk during vvECMO.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 534 ROTEM™ assays from 57 patients over 574 days was conducted.
- Patients were categorized into three groups based on bleeding severity using the Freiburg ECMO bleeding assessment.
- ROTEM™ results were compared with basic and comprehensive laboratory coagulation tests across bleeding severity groups and time points.
Main Results:
- Of 57 patients, 25% had no bleeding, 39% had mild bleeding, and 36% had relevant clinical bleeding. No fatal bleeding or bleeding shock occurred.
- The only significant difference observed was in the clotting time (CT) of the InTEM analysis across bleeding groups.
- ROTEM™ analysis, particularly ExTEM, FibTEM, and ApTEM, showed worsening CT and reduced clot firmness over time, but these changes did not reliably predict bleeding events.
Conclusions:
- Rotational Thrombelastography (ROTEM™) does not offer additional predictive information for bleeding events compared to standard laboratory coagulation tests in patients on vvECMO.
- Specific ROTEM™ results cannot be used to reliably predict the occurrence or severity of bleeding during vvECMO therapy.
- Current standard coagulation assessments remain the primary tool for evaluating bleeding risk in the vvECMO population.
More Related Videos
03:40Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without Left Ventricular Venting
Published on: January 17, 2025
05:44Author Spotlight: Utilizing Venoplasty Balloon Model in Rodents to Simulate Surgical Interventions for Deep Veins
Published on: May 24, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system...