Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Requirements for successful total knee replacements. Design considerations.

P S Walker1

  • 1Biomechanics Laboratories, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

The Orthopedic Clinics of North America
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

This study reviewed the development of knee replacement designs up to 1969. It found that partially conforming condylar implants with patellofemoral support had the best results. Cemented and uncemented designs both showed promise but needed refinement. Hinged implants had serious issues and were used only when condylar implants failed. The study emphasized the importance of surgical technique and design improvements to reduce wear and improve long-term outcomes. Future work should focus on optimizing implant geometry and materials.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility of single-use 3D-printed instruments for total knee arthroplasty.

The bone & joint journal·2019
Same author

Treatment of posttraumatic elbows with a new hinge-distractor.

Orthopedics·2014
Same author

Analysis of an early intervention tibial component for medial osteoarthritis.

Journal of biomechanical engineering·2014
Same author

Relation between knee motion and ligament length patterns.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2013
Same author

The Gerbich blood group system: a review.

Immunohematology·2010
Same author

Uncemented computer-assisted design-computer-assisted manufacture femoral components in revision total hip replacement: a minimum follow-up of ten years.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2010

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery outcomes research within musculoskeletal medicine
  • Medical device design in biomechanical engineering
  • Surgical implantation techniques in clinical orthopedics

Background:

Orthopedic surgery has long sought effective solutions for knee joint restoration. Prior research has shown that early interventions included hemiarthroplasty and rigid hinges. These approaches were limited in their ability to replicate natural joint function. The introduction of cemented metal-on-plastic designs in 1969 marked a shift in focus toward condylar replacements. However, variations in surface conformity and fixation methods led to inconsistent clinical outcomes. Unicompartmental and hinged designs remained in use for specific patient needs. Despite these efforts, the field lacked consensus on optimal design principles. No prior work had resolved how to balance motion, wear, and fixation over the long term.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aimed to evaluate the design evolution of knee replacements up to 1969. It sought to identify which design features correlated with better clinical outcomes. The researchers focused on condylar, unicompartmental, and hinged designs. They examined how variations in geometry and fixation influenced results. The study also considered how surgical techniques impacted implant performance. A specific goal was to determine which designs minimized complications like wear and loosening. The authors aimed to provide design guidance for future implant development. Their work sought to clarify which surgical and design parameters were most critical for success.

Keywords:
knee replacement designcondylar implantarthroplasty outcomesorthopedic surgery

Frequently Asked Questions

Partially conforming condylar designs with patellofemoral joint provisions showed the best outcomes.

Including provisions for the patellofemoral joint improved function and reduced complications.

Hinged designs, whether lax or fixed-axis, caused significant complications and were reserved for failed condylar implants.

Component placement and sizing directly affected the potential range of motion and implant stability.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The authors conducted a historical review of knee replacement designs through 1969. They analyzed clinical reports and design specifications from various manufacturers. The study categorized implants into condylar, unicompartmental, and hinged types. For each category, they assessed factors like surface conformity and fixation methods. The researchers compared clinical outcomes across different design variations. They also evaluated how surgical parameters affected implant performance. A key component of the analysis was the role of the patellofemoral joint in implant success. The study concluded with design recommendations for future implant development.

Main Results:

The most successful outcomes were observed with partially conforming condylar designs. These implants included provisions for the patellofemoral joint, which improved function. Cemented condylar components were the most frequently reported in clinical literature. Press-fit uncemented designs showed promise but were less commonly used. Unicompartmental implants had variable results depending on patient selection. Hinged designs, whether lax or fixed-axis, were associated with significant complications. These issues limited their use to cases where condylar implants failed. Long-term challenges included wear and loosening, which required design improvements. The study emphasized the need for better material quality and geometry optimization.

Conclusions:

The authors concluded that partially conforming condylar implants with patellofemoral support were most effective. They proposed that future designs should focus on optimizing geometry for motion and wear resistance. Cemented and uncemented fixation methods both had potential but required refinement. The study highlighted the importance of proper surgical placement and sizing. It also noted that unicompartmental designs were highly dependent on patient selection. Hinged implants remained problematic, limiting their clinical use. The authors suggested design modifications to reduce complications in revision cases. Their findings emphasized the need for continued innovation in implant materials and geometry.

Optimizing geometry for motion, minimizing wear, and improving long-term fixation remain unresolved issues.

The authors suggested better material quality, optimized surface geometry, and improved fixation methods.