Comparative evidence on harms in pediatric randomized clinical trials from less developed versus more developed

Dario Tedesco1, Mufiza Farid-Kapadia2, Martin Offringa2

  • 1Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo, 12, 40126, Bologna, Italy.

Insights

Harm rates in pediatric clinical trials show no significant differences between more developed and less developed countries. However, overall data on harms in children remains very limited, indicating a need for more research.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric clinical research
  • Global health equity
  • Medical intervention safety

Background:

  • Assessing comparative harm rates in pediatric randomized clinical trials (RCTs) between more developed countries (MDCs) and less developed countries (LDCs) is crucial for global health equity.
  • Existing data on adverse events in pediatric populations across different economic settings is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the rates of clinically important harm outcomes in pediatric RCTs conducted in MDCs versus LDCs.
  • To identify any systematic differences in harm reporting between these settings.

Main Methods:

  • A meta-epidemiologic evaluation of systematic reviews from the Cochrane Database (up to June 2014) was performed.
  • Meta-analyses including pediatric RCTs from both MDCs and LDCs reporting severe adverse events (AEs), discontinuations due to AEs, any AE, and mortality were analyzed.
  • Relative odds ratios (RORs) and summary RORs (sRORs) were calculated to compare harm rates between the two country groups.

Main Results:

  • Only 1% of relevant meta-analyses included pediatric RCTs from both MDCs and LDCs.
  • Analysis of 26 meta-analyses revealed no major systematic differences in harm rates: sROR for severe AEs was 0.92, for discontinuations 1.13, for any AE 1.10, and for mortality 0.99.
  • Significant differences (≥2-fold) in ROR point-estimates were observed in 35% of the meta-analyses.

Conclusions:

  • No significant systematic differences in harm rates were found in pediatric trials between MDCs and LDCs.
  • The study highlights a substantial limitation in the available data concerning harms in pediatric populations globally.
  • Further research is needed to comprehensively understand and address potential disparities in pediatric medical intervention safety.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
638
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.9K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
488
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism01:24

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism

In pediatric care, understanding the nuances of hepatic drug metabolism is crucial, as it significantly differs from that of adults. This divergence is primarily due to the developmental stage of drug-metabolizing enzymes, which affects how medications are processed in the body. In neonates, for instance, the activity of Phase I enzymes—critical for the initial breakdown of drugs—is markedly reduced, functioning at just 20–40% of the levels seen in adults. This reduction poses...
257
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution01:17

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution

Drug distribution in the pediatric population exhibits unique challenges and considerations due to the physiological differences between children, particularly neonates and infants, and adults. A crucial aspect of pediatric pharmacology is understanding how these differences impact the pharmacokinetics of various drugs, necessitating age-specific dosing strategies to ensure efficacy and safety.Neonates and infants have a higher total body water content, ~75%–90% of their body weight,...
337
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion01:26

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

In pediatric medicine, understanding the renal function and drug elimination nuances is crucial for administering safe and effective treatments. Newborns, in particular, display markedly slower renal functions than adults, profoundly affecting how drugs are cleared from their bodies. This slower drug clearance requires clinicians to extend the dosing intervals for many medications to prevent drug accumulation and toxicity while ensuring therapeutic efficacy.One key area where these adjustments...
284