Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

A Protocol to Set Up Needle-Free Connector with Positive Displacement on Central Venous Catheter in Intensive Care Unit
Published on: July 13, 2019
[Comparison of citrate 4% and heparin as tunneled-catheters-locking solution in chronic hemodialysis]
Guillaume Chazot1, Manolie Mehdi1, Christie Lorriaux1
1NephroCare Tassin-Charcot, 7, avenue du Maréchal-Foch, 69110 Saint-Foy-lès-Lyon, France.
Insights
Citrate 4% is a safe and effective alternative to heparin for catheter locking in hemodialysis patients. It shows similar catheter function and dialysis adequacy, with fewer plasminogen-tissular activator uses and lower costs.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Vascular Access Management
- Biomaterials
Background:
- Chronic hemodialysis necessitates reliable vascular access.
- Catheter-locking solutions prevent thrombosis and infection.
- Heparin has been the standard, but alternatives are sought.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare 4% citrate with heparin as a catheter-locking solution.
- To evaluate catheter dysfunction, dialysis adequacy, plasminogen-tissular activator (TPA) use, and costs.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of citrate in chronic hemodialysis.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, monocentric cohort study.
- 49 prevalent chronic hemodialysis patients were divided into heparin (n=26) and citrate (n=22) groups.
- Follow-up occurred from March to October 2016.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in catheter dysfunction rates (4.23% heparin vs. 4.14% citrate).
- Similar dialysis adequacy was observed between groups.
- Citrate use was associated with significantly lower TPA use (P=0.022) and reduced costs (€1.42 vs. €2.94 per session).
- Higher prevalence of diabetes in the citrate group (P=0.025).
Conclusions:
- Citrate 4% is non-inferior to heparin for catheter locking in hemodialysis.
- Citrate demonstrates comparable catheter function and dialysis adequacy.
- Citrate offers benefits of reduced TPA use and lower costs.
Introduction:
Citrate 4% is an alternative to heparin as catheter-locking solution in chronic hemodialysis patients. We compared catheter dysfunction episodes, dialysis adequacy, plasminogen-tissular activators use and costs according to catheter-locking solution in our centre.
Methods:
Prospective, monocentric, cohort study (NephroCare Tassin-Charcot) on 49 prevalent patients in chronic hemodialysis. Two main groups were formed according to the prescription of catheter-locking solution at the beginning of the study (03/02/2016) and followed until 05/10/2016: heparin (n=26) and citrate (n=22).
Results:
The number of diabetic patients was higher in the citrate group (12/22) than in the heparin one (5/26; P=0.025). The 2 groups were comparable for the other studied variables. We didn't observe any difference in terms of catheter-dysfunction (4.23 versus 4.14% in heparin and citrate groups, respectively; P=1.0) and dialysis adequacy. The prescription of citrate was associated with lower TPA uses (1/604 versus 14/946; P=0.022) and lower costs (1.42 € for one session versus 2.94 €).
Conclusion:
Administration of citrate 4% as a catheter-locking solution is not inferior to heparin in terms of catheter-dysfunction episodes, is associated with similar dialysis adequacy results, lower plasminogen-tissular activators uses and reduced costs in chronic prevalent hemodialysed patients.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview

