Exposure to human voices has beneficial effects on preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit

Sahar Saliba1, Rana Esseily1, Manuela Filippa2,3

  • 1Laboratoire Ethologie, Cognition, Développement, Univiversité Paris Nanterre, Nanterre, France.

Insights

Nonmaternal voices positively impact preterm infants' clinical stability, improving heart rate, respiration, and behavior. However, study heterogeneity limits definitive conclusions, necessitating further research.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal care
  • Developmental pediatrics
  • Auditory neuroscience

Background:

  • Preterm infants experience significant physiological and developmental challenges.
  • Non-traditional interventions are explored to improve clinical outcomes in vulnerable neonates.
  • The impact of auditory stimuli, specifically non-maternal voices, on preterm infants requires comprehensive review.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review existing literature on the effects of non-maternal voices on preterm infants' clinical outcomes.
  • To synthesize findings regarding short-term and long-term effects of vocal stimuli.
  • To identify trends and limitations in current research.

Main Methods:

  • Literature search conducted up to March 2016.
  • Inclusion criteria applied to select relevant studies.
  • Analysis of 11 studies focusing on preterm infant outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Vocal stimuli demonstrated positive effects on preterm infants' physiological stability (heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation).
  • Behavioral measures and feeding skills showed improvements in response to vocal stimuli.
  • Ten studies focused on short-term outcomes, while only one examined long-term effects.

Conclusions:

  • Non-maternal vocal stimuli appear beneficial for preterm infant stability.
  • Heterogeneity in study methodologies and outcome measures complicates definitive conclusions.
  • Further rigorous research is needed to establish the efficacy and optimal application of vocal interventions.