Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

04:52
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
Published on: February 3, 2023
1.4K
Genetic drift and selection in many-allele range expansions
Bryan T Weinstein1, Maxim O Lavrentovich2, Wolfram Möbius3,4,5
1School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Plos Computational Biology
|December 2, 2017
Summary
We studied competing E. coli strains in expanding colonies using experiments and simulations. A random walk model accurately predicts evolutionary dynamics, revealing key parameters governing selection and genetic drift.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Microbial Ecology
- Mathematical Modeling
Background:
- Range expansions are crucial in microbial ecology.
- Understanding competing strain dynamics is key to predicting evolution.
- Radially expanding colonies offer a model system for studying these dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the evolutionary dynamics of competing E. coli strains.
- To compare experimental data with numerical simulations.
- To develop a predictive model for microbial range expansions.
Main Methods:
- Experimental observation of four competing E. coli strains in radially expanding colonies.
- Numerical simulations using a 1D ring model of biased random walkers.
- Analysis of average strain fractions, correlation functions, and domain wall dynamics.
- Development of a new technique to measure small selective differences.
Main Results:
- Evolutionary dynamics collapse onto master curves governed by three key parameters.
- Selection dominates over genetic drift beyond a specific expansion length.
- A dimensionless constant quantifies the interplay of colony curvature and selection.
- Simulations accurately predict experimental dynamics without additional fitting.
Conclusions:
- The random walk model is a powerful predictive tool for microbial range expansions.
- The model accurately describes the evolutionary dynamics of multiple genotypes with varying fitnesses.
- Key parameters identified provide insights into the balance of selection and drift.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
64.7K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
64.7K
Genetic Drift
44.3K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
44.3K
Gene Flow
38.1K
Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
38.1K
What is Population Genetics?
65.0K
A population is composed of members of the same species that simultaneously live and interact in the same area. When individuals in a population breed, they pass down their genes to their offspring. Many of these genes are polymorphic, meaning that they occur in multiple variants. Such variations of a gene are referred to as alleles. The collective set of all the alleles within a population is known as the gene pool.
65.0K
Genetics of Speciation
22.0K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
22.0K
Types of Selection
45.3K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
45.3K

