Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Assessment of the Efficacy of An Osteopathic Treatment in Infants with Biomechanical Impairments to Suckling
Published on: February 5, 2019
Labour induction practices in France: A population-based declarative survey in 94 maternity units
P Blanc-Petitjean1, M Salomé2, C Dupont3
1Inserm UMR 1153, obstetrical, perinatal and pediatric epidemiology research team (EPOPé), centre for epidemiology and statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), DHU risks in pregnancy, Paris Descartes university, 75014 Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Louis-Mourier hospital, Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Louis-Mourier hospital, hôpitaux universitaires Paris Nord Val-de-Seine, AP-HP, DHU risks in pregnancy, Paris Diderot university, 92700 Colombes, France.
French maternity units show significant variation in labor induction methods and indications. Many units employ non-recommended practices, highlighting a need to assess the safety and effectiveness of current labor induction strategies.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Perinatal Medicine
- Clinical Practice Research
Background:
- In 2016, 22.0% of deliveries in France were induced, with significant heterogeneity in methods and indications.
- Lack of high-level evidence has led to non-recommended practices in labor induction.
- Understanding current practices is crucial as they may influence perinatal outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report current practices of labor induction in France.
- To investigate the methods and attitudes towards labor induction in French maternity units.
Main Methods:
- A survey was conducted across 94 maternity units in seven perinatal networks.
- A questionnaire was emailed to department heads or delivery room supervisors regarding induction methods and attitudes in specific obstetric situations.
Main Results:
- Labor induction rates varied widely (7.7%–33%) across maternity units.
- Most units used multiple agents for cervical ripening, with dinoprostone and balloon catheters being common.
- A significant proportion of units (75.5%) reported inductions without medical indication, and 23.4% even with unfavorable cervices. Practices for specific obstetric scenarios also varied widely.
Conclusions:
- The wide variability and persistence of disapproved practices in labor induction necessitate an evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of different strategies.
- Standardization of labor induction protocols based on evidence is recommended to improve perinatal outcomes.
More Related Videos
12:17The 4-vessel Sampling Approach to Integrative Studies of Human Placental Physiology In Vivo
Published on: August 2, 2017
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.