Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Anesthesia for cesarean section--effects on neonates.

B Y Ong1, M M Cohen, R J Palahniuk

  • 1Department of Anaesthesia, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

Anesthesia and Analgesia
|March 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

General anesthesia in cesarean sections is linked to poorer neonatal outcomes compared to regional anesthesia, especially in non-elective cases. This includes lower Apgar scores and increased need for respiratory support for newborns.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DNA damage evaluation of hydroxyapatite on fibroblast cell L929 using the single cell gel electrophoresis assay.

The Medical journal of Malaysia·2004
Same author

Anesthesia for Cesarean section and posterior fossa craniotomy in a patient with von Hippel-Lindau disease.

Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie·2001
Same author

Prolonged epidural infusions of ropivacaine (2 mg/mL) after colonic surgery: the impact of adding fentanyl.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2001
Same author

Submental orotracheal intubation for maxillofacial surgery.

Anesthesiology·2000
Same author

Epidural analgesia for labour.

Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie·1999
Same author

Continuous epidural ropivacaine 0.2% for analgesia after lower abdominal surgery.

Anesthesia and analgesia·1997

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Obstetrics

Background:

  • Cesarean section anesthesia effects on neonates are primarily studied in elective procedures.
  • Limited data exists on outcomes for both elective and non-elective cesarean sections.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of general versus regional anesthesia on neonatal outcomes after both elective and non-elective cesarean sections.
  • To compare Apgar scores, need for respiratory support, and neonatal mortality rates based on anesthetic technique.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of 3940 neonates delivered via cesarean section (1975-1983).
  • Data collected via maternal interviews and review of medical records.
  • Neonatal outcomes assessed using 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores, need for intubation/ventilation, and 30-day mortality.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • General anesthesia was associated with worse neonatal outcomes than regional anesthesia.
  • Neonates exposed to general anesthesia had lower 1-minute Apgar scores in elective and non-elective cesarean sections.
  • Non-elective cesarean sections with general anesthesia showed higher rates of low Apgar scores and increased need for intubation/ventilation.

Conclusions:

  • General anesthesia poses a higher risk for adverse neonatal outcomes following cesarean delivery compared to regional anesthesia.
  • The negative impact of general anesthesia is more pronounced in non-elective cesarean sections.
  • No significant difference in neonatal mortality was observed between general and regional anesthesia groups.