Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
Published on: August 13, 2019
Bone autografts & allografts placed simultaneously with dental implants in rabbits
Marna Ribeiro1, Erica Hohlenwerger Fraguas1, Keila Ilse Cangussu Brito1
1Universidade Santo Amaro, Department of Implantology, Rua Professor Enéas de Siqueira Neto, 340, Jardim Das Imbuias, São Paulo, SP, CEP 04829-30, Brazil.
Autografts and allografts showed similar implant stability, removal torque, and bone integration in rabbit tibias. This suggests comparable outcomes for both grafting materials in this model.
Area of Science:
- Oral Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Regenerative Medicine
Background:
- Dental implant stability and osseointegration are crucial for successful restoration.
- Grafting materials, including autografts and allografts, are used to enhance bone regeneration around implants.
- Comparing the efficacy of different graft types is essential for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the stability, removal torque, bone-to-implant contact (BIC), and bone area (BA) of implants placed with onlay autografts versus allografts.
- To evaluate the osseointegration of implants using autogenous and allogeneic bone grafts in a rabbit tibia model.
Main Methods:
- Eighteen rabbits underwent simultaneous placement of implants with either autografts (Group 1) or allografts (Group 2) in a vertical peri-implant defect model.
- Implant stability was assessed using resonance frequency analysis (ISQ) at T0 and T18 weeks post-surgery.
- Removal torque and histomorphometric analysis (BIC and BA) were performed at 18 weeks.
Main Results:
- Both autografts and allografts demonstrated significant increases in implant stability (ISQ) from T0 to T18.
- No significant differences were found between the autograft and allograft groups in terms of removal torque, BIC, or BA.
- Histomorphometric analysis confirmed comparable bone integration between the two graft types.
Conclusions:
- Autografts and allografts provide similar outcomes regarding implant stability, mechanical retention (removal torque), and bone apposition (BIC and BA).
- Both grafting materials are effective in supporting osseointegration when used with dental implants in this rabbit model.
- These findings suggest that allografts may be a viable alternative to autografts in specific clinical scenarios.
More Related Videos
13:16Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
Published on: December 22, 2015
09:09Treatment with Vancomycin Loaded Calcium Sulphate and Autogenous Bone in an Improved Rabbit Model of Bone Infection
Published on: March 14, 2019