Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Extraction and Quantification of Soluble, Radiolabeled Inositol Polyphosphates from Different Plant Species using SAX-HPLC
Published on: June 26, 2020
Pareto-optimal reversed-phase chromatography separation of three insulin variants with a solubility constraint
Karolina Arkell1, Hans-Kristian Knutson1, Søren S Frederiksen2
1Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, SE-211 00, Lund, Sweden.
Abstract:
With the shift of focus of the regulatory bodies, from fixed process conditions towards flexible ones based on process understanding, model-based optimization is becoming an important tool for process development within the biopharmaceutical industry. In this paper, a multi-objective optimization study of separation of three insulin variants by reversed-phase chromatography (RPC) is presented. The decision variables were the load factor, the concentrations of ethanol and KCl in the eluent, and the cut points for the product pooling. In addition to the purity constraints, a solubility constraint on the total insulin concentration was applied. The insulin solubility is a function of the ethanol concentration in the mobile phase, and the main aim was to investigate the effect of this constraint on the maximal productivity. Multi-objective optimization was performed with and without the solubility constraint, and visualized as Pareto fronts, showing the optimal combinations of the two objectives productivity and yield for each case. Comparison of the constrained and unconstrained Pareto fronts showed that the former diverges when the constraint becomes active, because the increase in productivity with decreasing yield is almost halted. Consequently, we suggest the operating point at which the total outlet concentration of insulin reaches the solubility limit as the most suitable one. According to the results from the constrained optimizations, the maximal productivity on the C4 adsorbent (0.41 kg/(m3 column h)) is less than half of that on the C18 adsorbent (0.87 kg/(m3 column h)). This is partly caused by the higher selectivity between the insulin variants on the C18 adsorbent, but the main reason is the difference in how the solubility constraint affects the processes. Since the optimal ethanol concentration for elution on the C18 adsorbent is higher than for the C4 one, the insulin solubility is also higher, allowing a higher pool concentration. An alternative method of finding the suggested operating point was also evaluated, and it was shown to give very satisfactory results for well-mapped Pareto fronts.
Related Concept Videos
Optimizing Chromatographic Separations
Band broadening refers to spreading solute bands as they travel through the column. This broadening can impact resolution. Plate height (H) represents the length required for one theoretical plate. A lower plate height corresponds to...
Ion-Exchange Chromatography
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Elution Process
Size-Exclusion Chromatography
Silica particles offer advantages such as rigidity,...
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Introduction
In HPLC, two phases play a critical role in the separation process:
Chromatography: Introduction
The phase in which the compounds linger or on which the compounds adsorb is called the stationary phase, whereas the mobile phase is the solvent that carries the solutes to be analyzed. In traditional column chromatography, the mixture flows through the stationary phase, and the compounds partition between the stationary and mobile phases...

