Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Cardiac Stress Test Induced by Dobutamine and Monitored by Cardiac Catheterization in Mice
Published on: February 10, 2013
Time to re-think the use of dobutamine in sepsis
Ryota Sato1,2, Michitaka Nasu1
1Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Urasoe General Hospital, Okinawa, Japan.
Insights
Dobutamine use in sepsis treatment is questionable, with recent trials showing no mortality benefit. Evidence suggests dobutamine may increase mortality in septic shock and carries risks like ischemia, prompting a reevaluation of its use.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Cardiology
Background:
- Dobutamine is frequently used in early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) for septic patients with myocardial dysfunction.
- Its role in improving sepsis and septic shock mortality remains controversial.
- Recent large trials (ProCESS, ProMISe, ARISE) did not demonstrate a mortality benefit for EGDT, despite higher dobutamine use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the established role of dobutamine in sepsis management.
- To assess the evidence regarding dobutamine's impact on mortality and patient-centered outcomes in sepsis and septic shock.
- To explore alternative therapeutic strategies, such as beta-blockers, in light of dobutamine's potential risks.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent randomized controlled trials (ProCESS, ProMISe, ARISE) comparing EGDT with standard care.
- Analysis of propensity score studies investigating dobutamine use in septic shock.
- Examination of clinical trial data on beta-blocker efficacy in sepsis, particularly with atrial fibrillation.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in mortality was observed between EGDT and standard care groups, despite increased dobutamine use in EGDT.
- Propensity score analysis indicated that dobutamine use was associated with higher mortality in septic shock patients.
- Beta-blockers have shown potential survival benefits in sepsis patients with atrial fibrillation and septic shock, suggesting risks of beta-stimulation.
Conclusions:
- The benefits of dobutamine in sepsis are unclear, and its use may be associated with increased mortality and adverse events like ischemia and tachyarrhythmia.
- Improvements in surrogate markers (e.g., cardiac index) do not consistently translate to improved patient outcomes.
- Current evidence necessitates a reevaluation of dobutamine's place in sepsis treatment protocols, considering potential harm and the benefits of alternative therapies.
Abstract:
Dobutamine is commonly used worldwide and included in the protocol for early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). Since the use of dobutamine in EGDT was reported, it has been considered to be an important component, especially in the treatment of septic patients with myocardial dysfunction. However, it is questionable whether dobutamine improves the mortality of sepsis and septic shock. In three recent randomized controlled trials (ProCESS, ProMISe, and ARISE trials), the frequency of dobutamine use was significantly higher in the EGDT group than in the standard care group, but there were no significant differences in the mortality between the groups. These results suggested that dobutamine use may have been overemphasized despite its insignificant effect on the mortality in septic patients. Further, a propensity score analysis revealed that dobutamine use was associated with higher mortality in patients with septic shock. Although dobutamine leads to an increase in cardiac index, myocardial oxygen demand also increases, thus increasing the risk of myocardial ischemia and tachyarrhythmia. It is well known that the mortality in sepsis complicated with atrial fibrillation (AFib) is worse than that in sepsis without AFib. A propensity score-matched analysis reported that β-blockers were associated with better survival in patients with sepsis complicated with AFib. Further, a randomized controlled trial reported that a short-acting β-blocker improved the survival in patients with septic shock. These studies also indicated the risk of β-stimulation during sepsis. Notably, improvements in surrogate markers, such as CI, do not always indicate improvements in patient-centered outcomes, such as mortality. Conversely, some evidence indicates the worsening of patient-centered outcomes despite improvements in surrogate markers. Thus, available evidence suggests that the benefits of dobutamine in patients with sepsis are unclear, but its use might be harmful rather than beneficial, considering the beneficial effects of β-blockers in sepsis that have been reported in recent clinical studies. From this perspective, we will soon have to rethink regarding dobutamine use in patients with sepsis.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics

