Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.1K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

273
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
273
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

233
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
233
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

638
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
638
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

1.9K
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
1.9K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.1K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When randomization is not random: Allocation bias in small sample, group sequential randomized clinical trials.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Reliability of bioimpedance spectroscopy in the upper trapezius muscle.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology·2026
Same author

Assessment of blood lead reference values for the Southern Ghanaian population against the background of international recommendations.

International archives of occupational and environmental health·2026
Same author

Assessing allocation bias in stratified clinical trials with multi-component endpoints evaluated using the stratified Wei-Lachin test.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Introducing a new "Preliminary Report" submission category for small-sample intervention studies: viewpoints from external experts.

Science & medicine in football·2026
Same author

A historical note: Rediscovering an unpublished response to Korn and Freidlin (2011).

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Integrating health economics and implementation science: a call to action.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Methods for incorporating test result information within the high-dimensional propensity score framework: application in UK electronic health record data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Sparse multi-way DMDC for longitudinal classification in high dimension low sample size data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Tree-based exploratory identification of predictive biomarkers in non-randomized data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Comparative evaluation of interrupted time series analytical methods for healthcare quality improvement research: a Monte Carlo simulation study.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Methodological advances in claims-based dementia algorithms: integrating medication and clinical data for medicare populations.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 17, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.3K

ERDO - a framework to select an appropriate randomization procedure for clinical trials.

Ralf-Dieter Hilgers1, Diane Uschner2, William F Rosenberger3

  • 1Department of Medical Statistics, RWTH Aachen University Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 19, Aachen, Germany. rhilgers@ukaachen.de.

BMC Medical Research Methodology
|December 6, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Choosing the right randomization procedure is crucial for unbiased clinical trials. This framework helps researchers select the best method by assessing bias and practical needs, improving trial integrity.

Keywords:
Chronological biasDesignRestricted randomizationSelection biasType I error probability

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 17, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.3K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Research Integrity

Background:

  • Randomization is essential for unbiased clinical trials, preventing selection bias and ensuring covariate comparability.
  • No single randomization procedure is universally optimal, necessitating careful selection based on trial context.
  • Decision-making for randomization procedures often receives less attention than analysis, with limited guidance available.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a framework (ERDO) for selecting appropriate randomization procedures in clinical trials.
  • To assess the impact of bias on Type I error rates.
  • To provide practical tools and guidance for investigators.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a framework weighting randomization properties against practical trial needs.
  • Assessed the influence of chronological and selection bias on Type I error probability.
  • Applied the framework to a case study of a 2-arm, single-center randomized clinical trial.

Main Results:

  • Derived scientific arguments to guide the selection of randomization procedures.
  • Developed and illustrated a template for choosing randomization methods via a case study.
  • Identified potential areas for future framework extensions.

Conclusions:

  • The ERDO framework offers a structured approach and user-friendly tools for selecting randomization procedures.
  • Standardized frameworks, adopted by regulators and industry, can reduce barriers to thorough randomization assessment and reporting.
  • Improved selection and reporting of randomization methods enhance overall clinical trial quality and reliability.