Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

12:43
A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
Published on: February 21, 2011
36.0K
Digitised evaluation of speech intelligibility using vowels in maxillectomy patients
Y I Sumita1, M Hattori1, M Murase1
1Department of Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
|December 6, 2017
Summary
Digital acoustic analysis of vowel formants can predict speech intelligibility (SI) in maxillectomy patients. This method offers a simple, accurate tool for clinicians to assess speech function after maxillectomy, aiding in rehabilitation planning.
Area of Science:
- Speech-language pathology
- Biomedical engineering
- Maxillofacial prosthetics
Background:
- Speech impairment is a significant functional disability post-maxillectomy, impacting quality of life.
- Accurate evaluation of speech intelligibility (SI) is crucial for effective speech rehabilitation.
- Current evaluation methods may be time-consuming, necessitating simpler, accurate alternatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the utility of digital acoustic analysis of vowels for predicting SI in maxillectomy patients.
- To understand the relationship between vocal tract speech production and its perceptual impact on SI.
- To assess the correlation between acoustic parameters and SI scores in patients with and without maxillofacial prostheses.
Main Methods:
- Collected speech samples from 33 male maxillectomy patients under two conditions: without and with a maxillofacial prosthesis.
- Calculated formant data for five vowels (/a/, /e/, /i/, /o/, /u/) using linear predictive coding.
- Determined the frequency range of the second formant (F2) and correlated it with speech intelligibility (SI) test scores.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in F2 range and SI scores were observed between conditions with and without a prosthesis (P < .0001).
- A strong significant correlation was found between F2 range and SI score in both conditions (Spearman's r = .843 and r = .832, P < .0001).
- The F2 range effectively predicted SI in maxillectomy patients.
Conclusions:
- Calculating the F2 range from five vowels demonstrates clinical utility for predicting speech intelligibility (SI) after maxillectomy.
- Digital acoustic analysis provides a valuable, objective tool for assessing speech function in this patient population.
- This method can aid clinicians in tailoring speech rehabilitation strategies for maxillectomy patients.

