Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development
Published on: April 19, 2024
No difference in self-reported frequency of choking between infants introduced to solid foods using a baby-led
1College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Insights
Baby-led weaning (BLW) is not linked to a higher choking risk. Traditional spoon-feeding methods resulted in more choking incidents with finger foods and lumpy purees.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Nutrition Science
- Infant Feeding Practices
Background:
- Baby-led weaning (BLW), where infants self-feed, is increasingly popular for introducing solids.
- Concerns exist regarding the safety of BLW, specifically choking risks.
- This study compares choking frequency between BLW and traditional spoon-feeding.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between infant feeding styles (BLW vs. traditional spoon-feeding) and choking frequency.
- To determine if BLW increases the risk of choking compared to traditional methods.
- To analyze choking episodes related to specific food textures and types.
Main Methods:
- A study involving 1151 mothers reporting on their infant's (4-12 months) feeding methods (strict BLW, loose BLW, traditional).
- Data collected on the frequency of spoon-feeding, puree use, and infant choking incidents.
- Mothers recalled choking events, frequency, and the type of food involved (puree, finger food).
Main Results:
- 13.6% of infants experienced choking. No significant difference in choking risk was found between weaning styles.
- Infants on traditional weaning had more choking episodes with finger foods and lumpy purees.
- No association between weaning style or puree/spoon-feeding frequency and choking was observed.
Conclusions:
- Baby-led weaning (BLW) does not appear to increase choking risk.
- Higher choking frequency on finger foods was observed in infants least exposed to them.
- Study limitations include noncausal results, self-selected sample, and recall bias.
Background:
Baby-led weaning (BLW) where infants self-feed family foods during the period that they are introduced to solid foods is growing in popularity. The method may promote healthier eating patterns, although concerns have been raised regarding its safety. The present study therefore explored choking frequency amongst babies who were being introduced to solid foods using a baby-led or traditional spoon-fed approach.
Methods:
In total, 1151 mothers with an infant aged 4-12 months reported how they introduced solid foods to their infant (following a strict BLW, loose BLW or traditional weaning style) and frequency of spoon-feeding and puree use (percentage of mealtimes). Mothers recalled if their infant had ever choked and, if so, how many times and on what type of food (smooth puree, lumpy puree, finger food and specific food examples).
Results:
In total, 13.6% of infants (n = 155) had ever choked. No significant association was found between weaning style and ever choking, or the frequency of spoon or puree use and ever choking. For infants who had ever choked, infants following a traditional weaning approach experience significantly more choking episodes for finger foods (F2,147 = 4.417, P = 0.014) and lumpy purees (F2,131 = 6.46, P = 0.002) than infants following a strict or loose baby-led approach.
Conclusions:
Baby-led weaning was not associated with increased risk of choking and the highest frequency of choking on finger foods occurred in those who were given finger foods the least often. However, the limitations of noncausal results, a self-selecting sample and reliability of recall must be emphasised.
More Related Videos
08:32Adapting Human Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study Methods to Detect and Characterize Dysphagia in Murine Disease Models
Published on: March 1, 2015
07:11Assessment of the Efficacy of An Osteopathic Treatment in Infants with Biomechanical Impairments to Suckling
Published on: February 5, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Suctioning the Oropharyngeal Airway
After assembling the equipment, the nurse should practice hand hygiene and don appropriate PPE according to infection control guidelines to avoid the...