Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
Socio-economic status and physicians' treatment decisions
Kurt R Brekke1, Tor Helge Holmås2, Karin Monstad2
1Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics (NHH), Bergen, Norway.
General practitioners (GPs) provide different services to patients based on socioeconomic status. While disparities exist in consultation length and medical tests, the study found no evidence of a social gradient in overall GP service provision for diabetes type II patients.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Primary Care Medicine
- Health Economics
Background:
- Socioeconomic status significantly influences healthcare access and outcomes.
- Understanding variations in general practitioner (GP) service provision is crucial for equitable healthcare.
- Diabetes type II management in primary care offers a focused model to study these relationships.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between patients' socioeconomic status and the services provided by general practitioners.
- To analyze differences in consultation length, medical tests, and fee payments based on patient education and income.
- To determine if a social gradient exists in GP service provision for type II diabetes patients.
Main Methods:
- Utilized administrative patient-level data from Norway (2008-2012).
- Focused on patients with diabetes type II to minimize patient heterogeneity.
- Employed GP fixed-effect models, controlling for patient characteristics.
Main Results:
- Patients with lower education received shorter consultations but more medical tests per visit.
- Patients with lower income received fewer consultations and medical tests.
- Patients with low education/income received fewer services in monetary terms per visit.
- However, patients with low education/income had more frequent GP visits and higher total service value annually.
- GPs demonstrated differential treatment based on socioeconomic status, but no social gradient was observed.
Conclusions:
- General practitioners' service provision varies significantly with patients' socioeconomic status.
- Disparities are evident in consultation duration and diagnostic testing, but not a clear social gradient in overall service value.
- Further research is needed to understand the implications of these differential treatment patterns on health equity.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethics and Bioethics
Social Psychology and Individual Behavior
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Metabolism and Excretion
Close Relationships and Culture

