Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

07:15
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020
7.6K
Computer-aided assessment of breast density: comparison of supervised deep learning and feature-based statistical
Songfeng Li1,2, Jun Wei3, Heang-Ping Chan3
1School of Mathematics, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, People's Republic of China.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
|December 7, 2017
Summary
A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) was developed for automated breast density estimation on digital mammograms. This DCNN approach significantly outperformed traditional methods, showing promise for improved cancer risk prediction.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
- Oncology
Background:
- Breast density is a significant risk factor for cancer.
- Accurate breast density assessment is crucial for risk stratification.
- Current methods for density estimation can be subjective and time-consuming.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a supervised deep learning approach for automated percentage density (PD) estimation on digital mammograms (DMs).
- To compare the performance of the deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) approach against a traditional feature-based statistical learning method.
Main Methods:
- Digital mammograms underwent log-transformation and multi-resolution preprocessing.
- A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) was trained using a domain adaptation resampling method to estimate a probability map of breast density (PMD).
- Percentage density (PD) was calculated from the PMD, and the DCNN approach was compared to a feature-based method using extracted gray level, texture, and morphological features.
Main Results:
- The DCNN approach achieved a Dice's coefficient (DC) of 0.79 ± 0.13 and Pearson's correlation (r) of 0.97 during cross-validation, outperforming the feature-based method (DC = 0.72 ± 0.18, r = 0.85).
- On an independent test set, the DCNN achieved DC = 0.76 ± 0.09 and r = 0.94, while the feature-based method achieved DC = 0.62 ± 0.21 and r = 0.75.
- The DCNN approach demonstrated significantly better performance and robustness compared to the feature-based learning approach.
Conclusions:
- The developed DCNN approach provides a robust and accurate method for automated percentage density estimation on digital mammograms.
- This automated approach has the potential to improve the efficiency and consistency of density reporting.
- The DCNN's performance suggests its utility in model-based breast cancer risk prediction.