Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Regional Differences in Antithrombotic Treatment for Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from the GLORIA-AF Phase II
Michał Mazurek1,2, Menno V Huisman3, Kenneth J Rothman4
1Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Insights
Antithrombotic therapy (ATT) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) varies globally. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly used, but significant regional disparities in ATT uptake persist, especially in Asia.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Public Health
Background:
- Guideline-adherent antithrombotic therapy (ATT) significantly reduces mortality and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.
- Global uptake of ATT for stroke prevention in AF exhibits considerable geographic variation.
- Understanding these variations is crucial for optimizing patient care and reducing stroke risk worldwide.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess thromboembolic risk and baseline antithrombotic therapy (ATT) in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) across different geographic regions.
- To identify factors associated with the prescription of ATT in a global registry of AF patients.
- To analyze the uptake and regional differences of oral anticoagulation (OAC) and non-VKA OACs (NOACs).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 15,092 patients newly diagnosed with non-valvular AF and at risk for stroke, enrolled in Phase II of the GLORIA-AF registry.
- Assessment of global oral anticoagulation (OAC) use, including vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-VKA OACs (NOACs), by geographic region.
- Evaluation of ATT prescription rates based on patient thromboembolic risk (low-risk vs. high-risk) and healthcare setting.
Main Results:
- Global oral anticoagulation (OAC) use was 79.9%, with highest rates in Europe (90.1%) and lowest in Asia (55.2%).
- Non-VKA OACs (NOACs) have replaced VKAs as the predominant OAC in all regions, though usage varied significantly (e.g., 66.5% in North America vs. 50.2% in Asia).
- Substantial intra-regional variations were observed, particularly in Asia, with significant differences in OAC use between community hospitals, university hospitals, and specialist offices, and between countries like China and Japan.
- 17.7% of high-risk patients globally were not anticoagulated, with rates as high as 42.4% in Asia.
Conclusions:
- Significant inter- and intra-regional disparities in antithrombotic therapy (ATT) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) exist globally.
- While guideline-adherent ATT can be improved, non-VKA OACs (NOACs) are a major driver of increased OAC use worldwide.
- Addressing these geographic and healthcare setting variations is essential to ensure equitable and effective stroke prevention in AF patients.
Abstract:
Introduction Although guideline-adherent antithrombotic therapy (ATT) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with lower mortality and thromboembolism, ATT uptake shows geographic variation worldwide. We aimed to assess thromboembolic risk and baseline ATT by geographic region and identify factors associated with prescription of ATT in a large, truly global registry of patients with recently diagnosed AF. Methods and Results Our analysis comprises 15,092 patients newly diagnosed with non-valvular AF at risk for stroke, enrolled in Phase II of Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (GLORIA-AF). Global oral anticoagulation (OAC) use was 79.9%, being highest in Europe (90.1%), followed by Africa/Middle East (87.4%) and Latin America (85.3%), North America (78.3%) and Asia (55.2%). Among OAC users, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been replaced by non-VKA OACs (NOACs) as the more prevalent OAC option in all regions, with highest use in North America (66.5%) and lowest in Asia (50.2%). In Asia, OAC was 80.4% in community hospitals but only 49.8% in university hospitals and 42.6% in specialist offices, and varied from 21.0% in China to 89.7% in Japan (NOACs at 5.8% in China and 83.3% in Japan). Globally, 76.5% of low-risk patients were prescribed ATT (46.1% OAC), whereas 17.7% high-risk patients were not anticoagulated (Europe 8.8%; North America 18.9%; Asia 42.4%). Conclusion Substantial inter- and intra-regional differences in ATT for stroke prevention in AF are evident in this global registry. While guideline-adherent ATT can be further improved, NOACs are the main contributor to high OAC use worldwide.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

