Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distractor avoidance and early quitting in visual search.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Effects of Prior Diagnosis on Second Opinions and Pathologist Viewing Behaviors: Results from a Randomized Trial in Breast Pathology.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2025
Same author

Limits of verbal labels in cognition: Category labels do not improve visual working memory performance for obfuscated objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Characterizing Interpretive and Diagnostic Competency Development in Pathology Training.

Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc·2025
Same author

Do Physicians Remember Cases? Implications for Longitudinal Designs in Medical Research and Competency Assessment.

Research methods in medicine & health sciences·2025
Same author

Electrophysiological Correlates of Visual Memory Search.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 17, 2026

VisualEyes: A Modular Software System for Oculomotor Experimentation
10:41

VisualEyes: A Modular Software System for Oculomotor Experimentation

Published on: March 25, 2011

13.3K

Simple eye-movement feedback during visual search is not helpful.

Trafton Drew1, Lauren H Williams1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 S 1530 E Beh S 1003, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
|December 8, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Online eye-tracking feedback did not improve visual search performance. Providing information about searched areas did not reduce false-negative errors or increase search efficiency in six experiments.

Keywords:
Eye-trackingFeedbackVisual attentionVisual search

More Related Videos

Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking
07:26

Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking

Published on: September 26, 2019

8.4K
Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
07:24

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane

Published on: August 22, 2025

570

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 17, 2026

VisualEyes: A Modular Software System for Oculomotor Experimentation
10:41

VisualEyes: A Modular Software System for Oculomotor Experimentation

Published on: March 25, 2011

13.3K
Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking
07:26

Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking

Published on: September 26, 2019

8.4K
Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
07:24

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane

Published on: August 22, 2025

570

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Human-computer interaction
  • Visual perception

Background:

  • Visual search is prone to false-negative errors, where targets are missed.
  • These errors, common in fields like medical diagnosis, stem from incomplete search patterns.
  • Lack of awareness regarding searched areas contributes to missed targets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if online eye-tracking feedback can reduce visual search errors.
  • To determine if providing information about searched areas improves search efficiency.
  • To test the hypothesis that feedback reduces false negatives and enhances speed without accuracy loss.

Main Methods:

  • Six experiments were conducted using online eye-tracking feedback.
  • Participants received real-time information about areas they had or had not searched.
  • Performance was measured by false-negative rates and response times.

Main Results:

  • Online eye-tracking feedback did not reliably decrease false-negative errors.
  • Search efficiency, measured by response times, did not significantly improve.
  • No performance benefits were observed across the six experiments.

Conclusions:

  • Online eye-tracking feedback is not an effective strategy for improving visual search performance.
  • Providing information about searched areas does not mitigate errors in target detection.
  • Further research is needed to explore alternative methods for enhancing visual search accuracy.