Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods for the evaluation of hearing aids.

H Levitt

    Scandinavian Audiology. Supplementum
    |January 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary

    Evaluating hearing aids involves four main methods, with research highlighting the need for better speech tests and audiological prediction. Individualized hearing aid fitting shows promising results for improved performance.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Field measurements of electromagnetic interference in hearing aids.

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001
    Same author

    Digital wireless telephones and hearing aids: new challenges for audiology.

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001
    Same author

    The nature of electromagnetic interference.

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001
    Same author

    Noise reduction in hearing aids: a review.

    Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2001
    Same author

    The narrative processes coding system: research applications and implications for psychotherapy practice.

    Journal of clinical psychology·2000
    Same author

    An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure.

    Ear and hearing·2000

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Hearing Science
    • Biomedical Engineering

    Background:

    • Hearing aid evaluation encompasses four categories: prescriptive selective amplification, selection from existing aids, fixed frequency-gain fitting, and adaptive master hearing aid fitting.
    • Each method presents unique advantages, disadvantages, and areas of controversy, necessitating a thorough review to identify research gaps.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review current hearing aid evaluation methods, discuss their pros and cons, and identify critical research needs.
    • To propose the simplest conventional hearing aid as a reference standard for evaluating advanced devices.
    • To report on the development of a prescriptive fitting protocol for a wearable master hearing aid.

    Main Methods:

    • Review and analysis of existing hearing aid evaluation methodologies.
    • Identification of research needs, including improved speech tests and audiological prediction methods.
    • Development and progress reporting on a prescriptive fitting protocol for a master hearing aid.

    Main Results:

    • The study identifies key research needs: enhanced speech tests with low variability, reliable audiological prediction of hearing aid performance, and optimization of conventional linear hearing aids.
    • A recommendation is made to use a simply configured, optimally matched conventional hearing aid as a benchmark for assessing other auditory devices.
    • Initial results from the master hearing aid protocol indicate that individualized adjustments yield superior subject performance.

    Conclusions:

    • Significant research is required to advance hearing aid fitting and evaluation precision.
    • The development of a standardized, prescriptive fitting protocol for master hearing aids is progressing well.
    • Individualized hearing aid fitting, even with conventional technology, can significantly enhance user outcomes.

    Related Experiment Videos