Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Chronic Salmonella Infection Induced Intestinal Fibrosis
Published on: September 22, 2019
Universal etiology, multifactorial diseases and the constitutive model of disease classification
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; Research Associate, African Centre for Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.
Abstract:
Infectious diseases are often said to have a universal etiology, while chronic and noncommunicable diseases are said to be multifactorial in their etiology. It has been argued that the universal etiology of an infectious disease results from its classification using a monocausal disease model. In this article, I will reconstruct the monocausal model and argue that modern 'multifactorial diseases' are not monocausal by definition. 'Multifactorial diseases' are instead defined according to a constitutive disease model. On closer analysis, infectious diseases are also defined using the constitutive model rather than the monocausal model. As a result, our classification models alone cannot explain why infectious diseases have a universal etiology while chronic and noncommunicable diseases lack one. The explanation is instead provided by the Nineteenth Century germ theorists.
Insights
Infectious diseases are not universally monocausal, and chronic diseases are not inherently multifactorial. Both disease types are defined by a constitutive model, with germ theory explaining historical differences in etiological classification.
Area of Science:
- Medical Philosophy
- Epidemiology
- History of Medicine
Background:
- Traditionally, infectious diseases are viewed as having a universal, monocausal etiology, while chronic diseases are considered multifactorial.
- This distinction is often attributed to the classification models used for each disease type.
Observation:
- The monocausal model, often associated with infectious diseases, is critically examined.
- Modern 'multifactorial diseases' are defined by a constitutive model, not a monocausal one.
- Closer analysis reveals that infectious diseases are also defined using the constitutive model.
Findings:
- Neither infectious nor chronic diseases are strictly defined by the monocausal model.
- Both disease categories are better understood through a constitutive disease model.
- Classification models alone do not explain the perceived difference in etiological universality.
Implications:
- The historical perception of universal etiology in infectious diseases stems from 19th-century germ theory.
- Re-evaluating disease classification models is crucial for understanding disease etiology.
- This perspective challenges traditional epidemiological frameworks for infectious and chronic diseases.
Related Concept Videos
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Autoimmune Disorders
Concept and Mechanism of Autoimmune Diseases
The immune...
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Pedigree Analysis
Multicompartment Models: Overview
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...

