SUPERA stent outcomes in Above-The-Knee IntervEntions: Effects of COMPression and ELongation (SAKE-COMPEL) Sub-study

The interwoven nitinol design of the Supera stent has been shown to have superior radial strength and fracture resistance resulting in higher patency rates at 6 and 12months. A detailed sub-analysis of SUPERB trial showed differences in patency based on stent conformation post deployment. We evaluated the patency of the stent within the SAKE study cohort based on stent deployment conformation.

We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 63 patients (77 limbs) with Rutherford class 2-5 symptoms who received Supera stents in the femoro-popliteal artery from March 2010 through May 2011 as part of the SAKE study. These patients were followed for patency and the need for re-intervention over a mean follow up of 15months. Compression or Elongation was defined as follows based on previous sub-analyses: Moderate Compression (-40 to -21%); Minimal Compression (-20 to -11%); Nominal (-10 to 10%); Minimal Elongation (11 to 20%); Moderate Elongation (21 to 40%); and Severe Elongation (>40%). Significance was determined using Chi X² test.

The best patency rates (85.2% primary patency and 92.6% assisted primary patency) and lowest re-intervention rates (14.8%) were achieved with stent compression, followed by nominal deployment or minimal elongation, and worst outcomes (64.7% primary patency; 82.3% assisted primary patency; and 35.3% re-intervention) with stent elongation to moderate or severe degree.

Patency rates and re-intervention rates are variable based on deployment characteristics of the Supera stent. Best outcomes are achieved with compression of the stent during deployment.