Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Anteromesial Temporal Lobectomy for Medically Intractable Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: An Operative Study
Published on: August 15, 2025
Resection of primary motor cortex tumors: feasibility and surgical outcomes
Objective:
Brain tumors involving the primary motor cortex are often deemed unresectable due to the potential neurological consequences that result from injury to this region. Nevertheless, we have challenged this dogma for many years and used asleep, as well as awake, intraoperative stimulation mapping to maximize extent of resection. It remains unclear whether these tumors can be resected with acceptable morbidity, whether performing the surgery with the patient awake or asleep impacts extent of resection, and how stimulation mapping influences outcomes.
Methods:
A retrospective chart review was performed on the senior author's cohort to identify patients treated between 1998 and 2016 who underwent resection of tumors that were located within the primary motor cortex. Clinical notes, operative reports, and radiographic images were reviewed to identify intraoperative stimulation mapping findings and functional outcomes following tumor resection. Extent of resection was quantified volumetrically. Characteristics of patients were analyzed to identify factors associated with postoperative motor deficits.
Results:
Forty-nine patients underwent 53 resections of tumors located primarily within the motor cortex. Stimulation mapping was performed in all cases. Positive cortical sites for motor response were identified in 91% of cases, and subcortical sites in 74%. Awake craniotomy was performed in 65% of cases, while 35% were done under general anesthesia. The mean extent of resection was 91%. There was no statistically significant difference in extent of resection in cases done awake compared with those done under general anesthesia. New or worsened postoperative motor deficits occurred in 32 patients (60%), and 20 patients (38%) had a permanent deficit. Of the permanent deficits, 14 were mild, 4 were moderate, and 2 were severe (3.8% of cases). Decreased intraoperative motor response and diffusion restriction on postoperative MRI were associated with permanent deficit. Awake motor mapping surgery was associated with increased diffusion signal on postoperative MRI.
Conclusions:
Resection of tumors from the primary motor cortex is associated with an increased risk of motor deficit, but most of these deficits are transient or mild and have little functional impact. Excellent extent of resection can be achieved with intraoperative stimulation mapping, suggesting that these tumors are indeed amenable to resection and should not be labeled unresectable. Injury to small perforating or en passage blood vessels was the most common cause of infarction that led to moderate or severe deficits. Awake motor mapping was not superior to mapping done under general anesthesia with regard to long-term functional outcome.
Insights
Resecting primary motor cortex brain tumors is feasible with intraoperative stimulation mapping, achieving high resection rates with mostly mild, transient motor deficits. Awake or asleep surgery did not significantly impact resection extent or long-term outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Oncology
- Neurology
Background:
- Primary motor cortex brain tumors are often considered unresectable due to potential neurological deficits.
- Intraoperative stimulation mapping (ISM) is utilized to maximize tumor resection while preserving function.
- The impact of awake versus asleep surgery on resection extent and outcomes remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of resecting primary motor cortex tumors using ISM.
- To compare the extent of resection and functional outcomes between awake and asleep craniotomy.
- To identify factors associated with postoperative motor deficits.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 49 patients (53 resections) between 1998-2016.
- Analysis of clinical notes, operative reports, and radiographic images for ISM findings and outcomes.
- Volumetric quantification of resection extent and statistical analysis of patient characteristics.
Main Results:
- 91% of cases showed positive motor response sites during ISM.
- Mean extent of resection was 91%, with no significant difference between awake (65%) and asleep (35%) surgery.
- 60% experienced new/worsened motor deficits, but 96.2% of permanent deficits were mild or moderate.
Conclusions:
- Primary motor cortex tumors can be resected with acceptable morbidity, challenging the unresectable dogma.
- Intraoperative stimulation mapping enables excellent resection extent.
- Most motor deficits are transient or mild; awake surgery offers no clear advantage over asleep surgery for long-term outcomes.

