Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Data Collection I

Data Collection I

Data collection gathers information needed to make accurate judgments about a patient's present condition. During a health history interview, subjective data is collected from the patient, their caregivers, or family members, and objective data is collected through observations and physical assessment. Patients are the primary source of subjective data. Thus information gathered from patients through interviews, observations, and physical examination is primary data. Secondary sources of...

Data Collection III

Data Collection III

The physical assessment examines the patient for objective data that defines the patient's condition, and aids in formulating the nursing care plan. The purpose of physical assessment is a health status appraisal, which includes identifying health problems, and establishing a database for nursing intervention.
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

Nursing Assessment

Nursing Assessment

The two sources for collecting information are primary and secondary. After gathering information, interpretation and validation help to complete the data. The purpose of assessment is to establish data with the initial information, to interpret data about the patient's perceived needs and health problems, and to respond to these problems identified.
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Similar patient-reported outcomes 6 months after unicompartmental and total knee replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective cohort study of 60,145 patients from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Acta orthopaedica·2026

Same author

Who is waiting to see the surgeon? sociodemographic, clinical characteristics and previous osteoarthritis care of people with knee osteoarthritis referred to public hospitals in Victoria, Australia.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage open·2026

Same author

Data Harmonization for Collaborative Research Among Australian and US Registries: A Case Study in Medullary Thyroid Cancer (MTC).

World journal of surgery·2026

Same author

The effectiveness of physiotherapy-led non-surgical and perioperative interventions for glenohumeral osteoarthritis: A systematic review.

Shoulder & elbow·2026

Same author

Supported implementation enhances injury prevention programme (Prep-to-Play) use in women and girls playing Australian Football: a pragmatic type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.

British journal of sports medicine·2026

Same author

Warning Signs From Increasing Wait Times for Total Hip and Knee Joint Replacement-Opportunities to Stay Ahead of the Wave and Improve Care.

The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 17, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Collecting patient-reported outcome measures.

Susannah Ahern¹, Rasa Ruseckaite¹, Ilana N Ackerman¹

¹Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Internal Medicine Journal

|December 11, 2017

Summary

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) enhance healthcare by providing patient insights. Integrating PROM with clinical data and using validated tools pre- and post-intervention is crucial for meaningful health outcomes.

Keywords:

health services outcomes patient quality

More Related Videos

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Collecting Sleep, Circadian, Fatigue, and Performance Data in Complex Operational Environments

Collecting Sleep, Circadian, Fatigue, and Performance Data in Complex Operational Environments

Published on: August 8, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 17, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Collecting Sleep, Circadian, Fatigue, and Performance Data in Complex Operational Environments

Collecting Sleep, Circadian, Fatigue, and Performance Data in Complex Operational Environments

Published on: August 8, 2019

Area of Science:

Health Services Research
Clinical Outcomes Measurement
Patient-Centered Care

Background:

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are valuable tools for assessing health status at individual, service, and system levels.
Effective use of PROM necessitates clearly defined patient populations for comparative analysis.
Integrating PROM with clinical data enhances their interpretability and clinical relevance.

Purpose of the Study:

To outline the essential components for the effective implementation and utilization of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM).
To emphasize the importance of validated tools and appropriate data collection methods in PROM programs.
To highlight the need for clinician and patient involvement in developing PROM initiatives.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature and best practices for patient-reported outcome measures (PROM).
Discussion of the requirements for meaningful PROM implementation, including population definition and data integration.
Exploration of various PROM collection methodologies and their respective advantages and disadvantages.

Main Results:

PROM are most meaningful when integrated with clinical data sets and applied to clearly defined patient populations.
Using reliable and validated tools for pre- and post-intervention PROM measurement is essential.
Successful PROM programs require strong clinician support and patient engagement.

Conclusions:

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) offer significant potential for improving healthcare quality and patient outcomes.
Strategic implementation, including appropriate tool selection, data integration, and stakeholder involvement, maximizes PROM utility.
Further development and adoption of PROM programs are recommended to enhance clinical decision-making and health system evaluation.