Lessons Learned From the Environmental Public Health Tracking Sub-County Data Pilot Project
Angela K Werner1, Heather Strosnider, Craig Kassinger
1Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects (Drs Werner and Shin, Ms Strosnider, and Mr Kassinger) and ORISE Postdoctoral Fellow, Environmental Public Health Tracking Branch (Dr Werner), National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Establishing national standards for sub-county data is crucial for comparing environmental health outcomes and improving local decision-making. This pilot project identified key challenges in data integration for the National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network.
Area of Science:
- Environmental public health
- Geographic information systems
- Health data analytics
Background:
- Small area data are vital for understanding local environmental health, outcomes, and risk factors.
- The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Environmental Public Health Tracking Program (Tracking Program) initiated a pilot project in 2014.
- The project aimed to integrate sub-county data into the National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (Tracking Network).
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility and challenges of integrating sub-county data into the Tracking Network.
- To identify best practices and recommendations for handling small area data.
- To inform the development of a standardized system for sub-county environmental public health data.
Main Methods:
- Pilot project involving collaboration between the Tracking Program and external grantees.
- Development of sub-county level data for multiple datasets.
- Standardization of data submission processes and geographic definitions.
- Documentation of challenges and decisions encountered by grantees.
Main Results:
- Challenges were identified in geocoding, data aggregation, population estimation, and data stability.
- Grantees documented specific issues encountered during the data development process.
- Insights gained provide a foundation for future data integration efforts.
Conclusions:
- National standards are needed for generating, analyzing, and sharing sub-county data.
- Standardization will enable comparison of outcomes, geographies, and time across different areas.
- Enhanced availability of small area data will improve the Tracking Network and support informed local decision-making.
More Related Videos
07:13Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs
Published on: April 9, 2021
11:21Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
Published on: July 27, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Introduction to Epidemiology
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Levels of Use of a GIS
