Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026
Controlled Cortical Impact Model for Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: August 5, 2014
Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: usage and clinical outcome in a single centre
Teodor Svedung Wettervik1, Samuel Lenell2, Lena Nyholm2
1Department of Neuroscience, Section of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. teodor.svedung-wettervik@neuro.uu.se.
Background:
Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of decompressive craniectomy (DC) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) have shown poor outcome, but there are considerations of how these protocols relate to real practice. The aims of this study were to evaluate usage and outcome of DC and thiopental in a single centre.
Method:
The study included all TBI patients treated at the neurointensive care unit, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden, between 2008 and 2014. Of 609 patients aged 16 years or older, 35 treated with DC and 23 treated with thiopental only were studied in particular. Background variables, intracranial pressure (ICP) measures and global outcome were analysed.
Results:
Of 35 DC patients, 9 were treated stepwise with thiopental before DC, 9 were treated stepwise with no thiopental before DC and 17 were treated primarily with DC. Six patients received thiopental after DC. For 23 patients, no DC was needed after thiopental. Eighty-eight percent of our DC patients would have qualified for the DECRA study and 38% for the Rescue-ICP trial. Favourable outcome was 44% in patients treated with thiopental before DC, 56% in patients treated with DC without prior thiopental, 29% in patients treated primarily with DC and 52% in patients treated with thiopental with no DC.
Conclusions:
The place for DC in TBI management must be evaluated better, and we believe it is important that future RCTs should have clearer and less permissive ICP criteria regarding when thiopental should be followed by DC and DC followed by thiopental.
