Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Production, Crystallization and Structure Determination of C. difficile PPEP-1 via Microseeding and Zinc-SAD
Published on: December 30, 2016
KRAS Switch Mutants D33E and A59G Crystallize in the State 1 Conformation
Jia Lu1, Asim K Bera1, Sudershan Gondi1
1Departments of Biochemistry and Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas , Dallas, Texas 75390, United States.
Abstract:
KRAS switch loop movements play a crucial role in regulating RAS signaling, and alteration of these sensitive dynamics is a principal mechanism through which disease-associated RAS mutations lead to aberrant RAS activation. Prior studies suggest that despite a high degree of sequence similarity, the switches in KRAS are more dynamic than those in HRAS. We determined X-ray crystal structures of the rare tumorigenic KRAS mutants KRASD33E, in switch 1 (SW1), and KRASA59G, in switch 2 (SW2), bound to GDP and found these adopt nearly identical, open SW1 conformations as well as altered SW2 conformations. KRASA59G bound to a GTP analogue crystallizes in the same conformation. This open conformation is consistent with the inactive "state 1" previously observed for HRAS bound to GTP. For KRASA59G, switch rearrangements may be regulated by increased flexibility in the 57DXXGQ61 motif at codon 59. However, loss of interactions between side chains at codons 33 and 35 in the SW1 33DPT35 motif drives changes for KRASD33E. The 33DPT35 motif is conserved for multiple members of the RAS subfamily but is not found in RAB, RHO, ARF, or Gα families, suggesting that dynamics mediated by this motif may be important for determining the selectivity of RAS-effector interactions. Biochemically, the consequence of altered switch dynamics is the same, showing impaired interaction with the guanine exchange factor SOS and loss of GAP-dependent GTPase activity. However, interactions with the RBD of RAF are preserved. Overall, these observations add to a body of evidence suggesting that HRAS and KRAS show meaningful differences in functionality stemming from differential protein dynamics independent of the hypervariable region.
More Related Videos
11:27X-Ray Crystallography to Study the Oligomeric State Transition of the Thermotoga maritima M42 Aminopeptidase TmPep1050
Published on: May 13, 2020
09:31PCR Mutagenesis, Cloning, Expression, Fast Protein Purification Protocols and Crystallization of the Wild Type and Mutant Forms of Tryptophan Synthase
Published on: September 26, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Protein Folding
Conformations of Cyclohexane
The chair form is the most stable and derives its name from its resemblance to the “easy chair.” In the chair conformation, two carbon atoms are arranged out-of-plane — one above and one below, minimizing the torsional strain. In the chair form, the bond angle is very close to the ideal tetrahedral value,...
Polymer Classification: Crystallinity
Crystalline domains are the regions where polymer chains are aligned in an orderly manner and held together in proximity by intermolecular forces. For example, chains in the crystalline domains of polyethylene and nylon are bound together by van der Waals...