Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Communication indices of crew coordination.

B G Kanki1, S Lozito, H C Foushee

  • 1NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035.

Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How temperament shapes the network of attention: Insights from the attention network test and pupil dilation.

Biological psychology·2025
Same author

"Don't stop believing" - Decoding belief dynamics in the brain: An ALE meta-analysis of neural correlates in belief formation and updating.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2025
Same author

Speech production and cognitive deficits on Mt. Everest.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·1995
Same author

Cognitive defects at altitude.

Nature·1994
Same author

Organization, selection, and training of crews for extended spaceflight: findings from analogs and implications.

Journal of spacecraft and rockets·1990
Same author

How effective is cockpit resource management training? Exploring issues in evaluating the impact of programs to enhance crew coordination.

Flight safety digest (Arlington, Va. : 1988)·1990

Low-error flightcrews (FC) exhibit consistent communication patterns, unlike high-error FCs. Standardized communication enhances crew coordination and performance by increasing predictability.

Area of Science:

  • Aviation Psychology
  • Human Factors Engineering
  • Communication Studies

Background:

  • Effective communication is crucial for crew performance in high-risk environments.
  • Understanding communication patterns can help identify factors influencing errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify speech variations differentiating low- and high-error flightcrews.
  • To explore the relationship between communication patterns and crew performance in flight simulators.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of transcribed verbal data from 10 two-person flightcrews in full mission simulator flights.
  • Treating speech as interactive sequences within the context of crewmember dialogue.

Main Results:

  • Low-error crews displayed marked homogeneity in communication patterns, suggesting a standard form of communication.

Related Experiment Videos

  • High-error crews showed heterogeneity in patterns, indicating a lack of conventionalized communication.

    • Conclusions:

    • Homogeneous communication patterns in low-error crews facilitate coordination and enhance performance.
    • Adherence to communication conventions increases predictability and improves crew coordination.