Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables01:28

Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables

288
Body:Biologics, derived from living sources such as humans, animals, or microorganisms, represent a significant category of pharmaceuticals. These complex molecules, developed through advanced biotechnological methods or purified from natural sources, include essential medical treatments like insulin and growth hormones. The complexity of biologics arises from their large molecular structures and the intricate processes required for their production, making them distinct from conventional...
288
Sampling Methods: Overview01:06

Sampling Methods: Overview

3.5K
A sample refers to a smaller subset representative of a larger population. In analytical chemistry, studying or analyzing an entire population is often impractical or impossible. Therefore, samples are used to draw inferences and generalize the whole population. The sampling method selects individuals or items from a population to create a sample. Standard sampling methods include random, judgemental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling. 
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...
3.5K
Dosage Regimen: Individualization01:24

Dosage Regimen: Individualization

205
Individualization in dosing regimens is the customization of medication doses for individual patients. Its necessity arises from the goal of maximizing therapeutic benefits while minimizing risks. This approach is pivotal because human responses to drugs can vary widely; what is effective for one person may be inadequate or excessive for another. Interpatient (intersubject) variability refers to differences in drug responses between individuals, while intrapatient (intrasubject) variability...
205
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Excipients and Impurities-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence01:19

Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Excipients and Impurities-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

190
Pharmaceutical products contain more than just the active drug; they also contain various excipients such as binders, solubilizers, stabilizers, preservatives, and other elements. In some cases, impurities or contaminants might be present. Traditionally, quality control in pharmaceuticals has primarily focused on the analysis of the active drug, often overlooking the impact of these additional components. The recent issue with heparin contamination by over-sulfated chondroitin sulfate, a...
190
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Polymorphic Form-Related and Particle Size-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence01:27

Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Polymorphic Form-Related and Particle Size-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

189
Changes in polymorphic forms can significantly influence the bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. Although the FDA defines pharmaceutical equivalence based on having the same active ingredient, dosage form, and route of administration, it does not automatically disqualify products with different polymorphic forms. This means two products with different polymorphs can still be deemed pharmaceutically equivalent. However, polymorphic differences can affect properties like wettability,...
189
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications01:09

Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

167
The concept of therapeutic equivalence (TE) in drugs with multiple indications is complex. A generic drug may be therapeutically equivalent to a brand-name product for one specific indication, but this doesn't necessarily mean it's equivalent for all other indications. Evidence of TE in one patient group and bioequivalence shown in healthy volunteers can support—but not confirm—TE for other indications. However, definitive proof requires individual clinical studies for each...
167

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patenting Strategies on Inhaler Delivery Devices.

Chest·2023
Same author

Patient and Payer Incentives to Use Patented Brand-Name Drugs vs Authorized Generic Drugs in Medicare Part D.

JAMA internal medicine·2021
Same author

Pharmaceutical antitrust enforcement in the United States and Chile.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2021
Same author

Higher Drug Prices from Anticompetitive Conduct: Three Case Studies.

The Journal of legal medicine·2019
Same author

Antitrust, Market Exclusivity, and Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Industry.

JAMA·2018
Same author

Strategies that delay or prevent the timely availability of affordable generic drugs in the United States.

Blood·2016
Same journal

The Maternal Dilemma.

Cornell law review·2019
Same journal

Stricken: the Need for Positive Statutory Law to Prevent Discriminatory Peremptory Strikes of Disabled Jurors.

Cornell law review·2018
Same journal

Order Without Intellectual Property Law: Open Science in Influenza.

Cornell law review·2017
Same journal

Cross-Market Mergers in Healthcare: Adapting Antitrust Regulation to Address a Growing Concern.

Cornell law review·2017
Same journal

"Unique Identities and Vulnerabilities": the Case for Transgender Identity as a Basis for Asylum.

Cornell law review·2016
Same journal

Unquantified Benefits and the Problem of Regulation Under Uncertainty.

Cornell law review·2016
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
08:01

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management

Published on: November 30, 2022

5.7K

Sharing, samples, and generics: an antitrust framework.

Michael A Carrier1

  • 1Rutgers Law School.

Cornell Law Review
|December 14, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Brand pharmaceutical companies block generic drug entry by withholding samples, hindering competition and increasing costs. Antitrust law should scrutinize this monopolization tactic to ensure fair access to affordable medicines.

More Related Videos

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
07:25

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis

Published on: May 4, 2017

18.3K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Biotherapeutic Mass Calculation by Introducing mAbScale, a Python-Based Desktop Application
04:24

Author Spotlight: Advancing Biotherapeutic Mass Calculation by Introducing mAbScale, a Python-Based Desktop Application

Published on: June 16, 2023

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
08:01

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management

Published on: November 30, 2022

5.7K
In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
07:25

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis

Published on: May 4, 2017

18.3K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Biotherapeutic Mass Calculation by Introducing mAbScale, a Python-Based Desktop Application
04:24

Author Spotlight: Advancing Biotherapeutic Mass Calculation by Introducing mAbScale, a Python-Based Desktop Application

Published on: June 16, 2023

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Pharmaceutical Law and Policy
  • Antitrust Law
  • Drug Pricing and Access

Background:

  • Rising drug prices are limiting consumer access to essential and life-saving medications.
  • Brand pharmaceutical firms are increasingly using Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) to prevent generic drug market entry.
  • Existing regulations like the Hatch-Waxman Act aim to promote generic competition, but their effectiveness is hampered by sample access issues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze how brand firms exploit REMS to block generic competition through sample denial.
  • To demonstrate the critical role of drug samples in the regulatory framework for generic drug approval.
  • To argue for antitrust intervention to ensure generic access to samples and promote market competition.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of brand firms' justifications for sample denial, including safety and product liability concerns.
  • Examination of the regulatory landscape, including the FDA's role and legislative frameworks (Hatch-Waxman Act).
  • Application of antitrust legal principles, specifically the 'no economic sense' test, to brand firms' conduct.

Main Results:

  • Over 100 generic firms report inability to access necessary samples, costing the market over $5 billion annually.
  • Brand firms' justifications for sample denial are rebutted, showing the conduct lacks legitimate business rationale beyond harming competitors.
  • The practice of denying samples constitutes a form of monopolization, distinct from other scrutinized antitrust behaviors like 'pay for delay'.

Conclusions:

  • The denial of drug samples by brand firms is an anticompetitive practice that warrants antitrust scrutiny.
  • Antitrust law can effectively address this issue, ensuring generic access to samples and upholding the pharmaceutical regulatory regime.
  • Given the failures of legislative and regulatory bodies, antitrust action is crucial for ensuring fair competition and affordable medicine.