Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Significance tests.

J S Bulman, J F Osborn

    British Dental Journal
    |March 11, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study describes simple methods to determine if a sample mean differs significantly from a standard value due to real effects or just sampling error. It explains the use of the null hypothesis and standard normal deviates with examples.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Are the school prevention programmes - aimed at de-normalizing smoking among youths - beneficial in the long term? An example from the Smoke Free Class Competition in Italy.

    Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita·2017
    Same author

    Violence against women in Rome: An analysis of cases treated in the gynecology emergency department of the hospital Umberto I between 1999 and 2013.

    Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita·2015
    Same author

    Towards a smoke-free hospital: how the smoking status of health professionals influences their knowledge, attitude and clinical activity. Results from a hospital in central Italy.

    Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita·2015
    Same author

    Indoor particulate matter and secondhand smoke: simulation of an exposure scenario.

    Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita·2014
    Same author

    Characterization of airborne trace metal and trace organic species from coal gasification.

    Environmental monitoring and assessment·2013
    Same author

    Perception of smoke-free policies among workers in an Italian Local Health Agency: survey of opinions, knowledge and behaviours.

    Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita·2013
    Same journal

    Association between area-level deprivation and hospital dental admissions in children under five.

    British dental journal·2026
    Same journal

    The role of multi-acid and traditional acid etching agents on the surface roughness of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic material.

    British dental journal·2026
    Same journal

    Oral health perceptions among elite athletes and elite para-athletes: psychosocial impacts, sports performance.

    British dental journal·2026
    Same journal

    Frank Clare Wilkinson CBE (1889-1979) dental professor in Manchester, Australia and London, second dean of the Eastman Dental Institute.

    British dental journal·2026
    Same journal

    Admissions factors and their associations with performance in dental education: a quantitative study exploring undergraduate admissions at a UK dental school.

    British dental journal·2026
    Same journal

    Dentistry Show Birmingham reflects a profession looking forward.

    British dental journal·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Statistical analysis
    • Hypothesis testing

    Background:

    • Distinguishing real differences from random variation is crucial in data analysis.
    • Understanding sampling error is fundamental for accurate interpretation of results.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present straightforward methods for assessing the significance of differences between sample means and standard values.
    • To clarify the role of sampling error versus genuine effects.

    Main Methods:

    • Discussion of the null hypothesis significance testing framework.
    • Explanation and application of standard normal deviates (Z-scores).
    • Illustrative examples provided for practical understanding.

    Main Results:

    • Methods are presented to evaluate if observed differences are statistically significant.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Guidance is offered on interpreting the practical importance of findings.

    • Conclusions:

    • Simple statistical methods can effectively differentiate between sampling error and real effects.
    • The null hypothesis and standard normal deviates are valuable tools for this assessment.