Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Grafting of bacterial cellulose nanofibers with polylactic acid (PLA) enables homogeneous dispersion in PLA and improved strength and stiffness without loss of ductility.

RSC advances·2026
Same author

Fine-Tuned Functionalizable Terpolymer Brush Nanocoating Resists Protein Adsorption and Bacterial Adhesion while Promoting Macrophage Activity and Osteoblast Proliferation.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2025
Same author

Alternating Magnetic Fields Remove Biofilms but Damage Cells on Implant Models Also with Negligible Bulk Heating.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2025
Same author

Surface-grafted cellulose particles with poly(butylene succinate) and poly(butylene adipate-<i>co</i>-terephthalate) for sustainable composites.

RSC advances·2025
Same author

Synthesis, Microbiology, and Biophysical Characterization of Mutanofactins from the Human Oral Microbiome.

ACS central science·2025
Same author

The native glycocalyx ultrastructure in humans and sponges is a self-assembled, lamellar micro- and nanoarray.

Communications biology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison
07:08

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison

Published on: October 20, 2020

8.1K

Nanoparticle Risks and Identification in a World Where Small Things Do Not Survive.

Erik Reimhult1

  • 1Department of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biologically Inspired Materials, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, 1190 Vienna, Austria.

Nanoethics
|December 15, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Public debate on nanomaterial risks often assumes they are static and identifiable by component risks. However, physical laws limit both actual risks and our ability to regulate them, urging caution against overregulation.

Keywords:
Colloidal scienceNanomaterialsNanoparticle aggregationNanoriskNanosafetyParticle characterizationRegulation

More Related Videos

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering
07:47

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering

Published on: September 16, 2016

7.8K
Preparation of Nanoparticles for ToF-SIMS and XPS Analysis
06:24

Preparation of Nanoparticles for ToF-SIMS and XPS Analysis

Published on: September 13, 2020

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison
07:08

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media through an Inter-Laboratory Comparison

Published on: October 20, 2020

8.1K
Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering
07:47

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering

Published on: September 16, 2016

7.8K
Preparation of Nanoparticles for ToF-SIMS and XPS Analysis
06:24

Preparation of Nanoparticles for ToF-SIMS and XPS Analysis

Published on: September 13, 2020

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Nanomaterials Science
  • Risk Assessment
  • Environmental Science
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • Public discourse on nanomaterial risks often oversimplifies their behavior, assuming invariance over time and environmental exposure.
  • Current risk assessment and regulatory approaches may incorrectly equate the risks of nanomaterials to those of their constituent nanoscale components.
  • Legislation for mitigating nanorisks often relies on an unachievable assumption of complete knowledge regarding nanomaterial distribution and composition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the assumptions underlying public and regulatory discussions on nanomaterial risks.
  • To highlight the limitations imposed by physical laws on the behavior of nanoparticles and their associated risks.
  • To question the feasibility of monitoring and enforcing regulations for nanomaterials given technological constraints.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion note analyzing the implications of physical laws governing nanoparticle behavior.
  • Critique of current assumptions in public debate and legislative approaches to nanorisks.
  • Exploration of the technological limits in verifying compliance with nanomaterial regulations.

Main Results:

  • Physical laws dictate that manufactured nanomaterials are not invariant and their risks are not solely determined by their nanoscale components.
  • The inherent properties of nanoparticles impose natural limits on the extent of public exposure to nanorisks.
  • Technological capabilities present significant challenges in accurately monitoring the distribution and composition of nanomaterials.

Conclusions:

  • Governmental actors should exercise caution against overreacting to the nanotechnological revolution, as widespread increased public exposure is unlikely.
  • Legal measures for regulating nanomaterials should be carefully considered, as compliance may be technologically unmonitorable.
  • A nuanced understanding of nanoparticle behavior and detection limits is crucial for developing effective and practical regulations.