Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Sites for measuring blood pressure

Sites for measuring blood pressure

Blood pressure measurement is a fundamental clinical procedure, providing crucial data for assessing cardiovascular health. Among the various sites for this measurement, the brachial and popliteal arteries are predominantly utilized due to their accessibility and the reliability of their readings. This lesson delves into the anatomical significance, methodology, and considerations of measuring blood pressure at these locations.
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)

Measuring blood pressure is a fundamental skill in healthcare that aids in diagnosing and monitoring hypertension and other cardiovascular conditions. An aneroid sphygmomanometer, commonly used in clinical settings, offers a manual and precise method for blood pressure measurement. The technique for using this instrument involves specific steps that must be carefully executed to ensure accuracy. The following detailed description outlines a two-step technique for assessing blood pressure using...

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)

This procedural guide systematically measures blood pressure using an oscillometric digital sphygmomanometer, emphasizing accuracy, patient safety, and comfort.
Prepare for the Procedure:

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the...

Special considerations while measuring blood pressure

Special considerations while measuring blood pressure

When assessing blood pressure (BP), healthcare professionals must consider various factors and potential unexpected outcomes to ensure accurate readings and provide proper patient care. Adhering to these guidelines is essential to achieving the most reliable results.
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.

Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure

Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure

Direct Method
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Noninvasive Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Anesthesia.

Anesthesiology·2026

Same author

Higher versus Routine Intraoperative Blood Pressure Targets in Noncardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Anesthesiology·2026

Same author

Agreement of minimally invasive pulse wave analysis with pulmonary artery and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

British journal of anaesthesia·2026

Same author

Postoperative hypotension in patients recovering from noncardiac surgery: a prospective, blinded observational study.

British journal of anaesthesia·2026

Same author

Intervals For Oscillometric Arterial Pressure Monitoring During Noncardiac Surgery: the '2.5-Minute Versus 5-Minute' Randomized Clinical Trial.

Anesthesiology·2026

Same author

Underdamping: An elephant in the room?

Intensive care medicine·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression

Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression

Published on: December 10, 2014

Error Grid Analysis for Arterial Pressure Method Comparison Studies.

Bernd Saugel¹, Oliver Grothe², Julia Y Nicklas¹

¹From the Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Anesthesia and Analgesia

|December 15, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new error grid analysis method assesses the clinical relevance of arterial pressure (AP) monitoring technologies. This method classifies measurement differences into risk levels, offering crucial insights beyond traditional statistical agreement tests.

More Related Videos

Real-Time Assessment of Spinal Cord Microperfusion in a Porcine Model of Ischemia/Reperfusion

Real-Time Assessment of Spinal Cord Microperfusion in a Porcine Model of Ischemia/Reperfusion

Published on: December 10, 2020

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness

Published on: May 3, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression

Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression

Published on: December 10, 2014

Real-Time Assessment of Spinal Cord Microperfusion in a Porcine Model of Ischemia/Reperfusion

Real-Time Assessment of Spinal Cord Microperfusion in a Porcine Model of Ischemia/Reperfusion

Published on: December 10, 2020

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness

Published on: May 3, 2018

Area of Science:

Cardiovascular physiology
Medical device validation
Clinical monitoring technologies

Background:

Arterial pressure (AP) measurement is vital for hemodynamic monitoring.
Numerous innovative AP monitoring technologies require rigorous validation.
Current validation methods like Bland-Altman analysis lack clinical relevance assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce an error grid analysis for AP method comparison studies.
To evaluate the clinical relevance of measurement differences between AP monitoring methods.
To provide a framework for adapting error grid analysis to various clinical contexts.

Main Methods:

Developed a smoothed consensus error grid with calibrated risk zones based on expert surveys.
Classified AP measurement differences into five risk levels (no risk to dangerous risk).
Utilized data from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II database for validation.

Main Results:

The proposed error grid analysis effectively illustrates the clinical relevance of AP measurement differences.
This method provides insights unobtainable through traditional Bland-Altman analysis.
Risk classification considers both measurement differences and the actual measurements.

Conclusions:

Error grid analysis offers a superior method for assessing the clinical significance of AP measurement discrepancies.
This approach enhances the validation of new AP monitoring technologies.
The framework is adaptable for diverse clinical settings and patient populations.