Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.7K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.7K
Open and closed-loop control systems01:17

Open and closed-loop control systems

1.8K
Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
1.8K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.5K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.5K
Feedback control systems01:26

Feedback control systems

733
Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
733

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ultrabroadband 1D and 2D NMR Spectroscopy.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2025
Same author

Generalized Bloch model: A theory for pulsed magnetization transfer.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2021
Same author

Maximizing efficiency of dipolar recoupling in solid-state NMR using optimal control sequences.

Science advances·2021
Same author

Application of Optimal Control Theory to Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Shaped pulses for transient compensation in quantum-limited electron spin resonance spectroscopy.

Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)·2019
Same author

Spin-Scenario: A flexible scripting environment for realistic MR simulations.

Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 16, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.5K

Cooperative broadband spin echoes through optimal control.

Wolfgang Kallies1, Steffen J Glaser1

  • 1Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85748 Garching, Germany.

Journal of Magnetic Resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)
|December 15, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces cooperative pulse design for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This novel approach improves Hahn echo performance by having excitation and refocusing pulses compensate each other's imperfections.

Keywords:
Cooperative pulsesHahn echoMagnetic resonanceOptimal control

More Related Videos

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.8K
Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques
09:01

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

Published on: April 4, 2017

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 16, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.5K
Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.8K
Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques
09:01

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

Published on: April 4, 2017

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Pulse Sequence Design

Background:

  • The Hahn echo sequence is a fundamental technique in magnetic resonance (MR).
  • Traditional methods optimize individual pulses in the sequence, addressing their unique imperfections.
  • This approach often limits the overall performance achievable for echo experiments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel approach for concurrently designing excitation and refocusing pulses in Hahn echo sequences.
  • To enable these cooperative pulses to compensate for each other's imperfections.
  • To enhance overall Hahn echo performance beyond conventional methods.

Main Methods:

  • Concurrent design of excitation and refocusing pulses.
  • Development of cooperative pulse sequences.
  • Comparison of cooperative pulses against conventional methods using simulations and experimental validation.

Main Results:

  • Cooperative pulse design allows individual pulses to tolerate imperfections.
  • This flexibility leads to improved overall Hahn echo performance.
  • Simulations and experiments confirm the enhanced performance of single-scan cooperative pulses.

Conclusions:

  • Concurrent design of cooperative pulses offers a significant advancement in Hahn echo sequences.
  • This method provides additional degrees of freedom, leading to superior MR performance.
  • The cooperative approach represents a more efficient strategy for optimizing MR experiments.